Kent and all, A test like this would be too scary to let "Out of the Bag" so to speak, so I am not surprised one little bit that such a test was not released for public consumption, especially given the time in which it was done... Kent Crispin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 04:58:31PM -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote: > > > > I'm getting tired of that particular piece of FUD myself. It > > > > introduced me to areas of BIND I never wanted to know about. Wasted > > > > about 2 months of my time. Not only did the BIND authors do this test, > > > > > > Reference, please... > > > > Again, Kashpureff, et. al., newdom, 1997/1998 > > Hmm. Your previous post said 1996. So I guess you are saying that > somewhere in the newdom archives from 1996-8 there is a post from > Kashpureff describing work by the BIND authors testing the number of > root zones, but oddly enough, the BIND authors themselves have not > published this study -- you would think that a study like that, on a > controversial subject, from an authoritative source, would be very > well known. > > -- > Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be > [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
