Saturday, July 17, 1999, 7:32:34 PM, Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always manage to leave something off of lists like these, but here are
> the ones that come to mind, some momnths later.
> By the list owner:
> 1. Enforcement of participation rules, post hoc and without documentation
> or group approval
> 2. Assertion of organizational goals which were without documentation and
> without group approval
> 3. By fiat calling for a couple of ostracism votes against participants
> with whom he disagreed, again without any documentation of procedures about
> ostracism or acceptable/unacceptable participation behavior (and the
> results of those votes were never announced.)
> 4. By fiat removing a participant who never expressed any desire to be
> removed.
> As I say, the list is probably longer, but this will no doubt provide
> enough fuel.
> At the least it gives a good indication of a consistent failure to
> comprehend rather basic concepts of due process.
By the way, would any of the other paticipants on these lists care to
apply Dave's above complaints on the IDNO (false as they are) to
ICANN?
I see ICANN has abundantly guilty of the very things he is trying to
push off as "sins" of the IDNO.
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
The Law is not your mommy or daddy to go crying
to every time you have something to whimper about.
