At 03:13 PM 7/16/99 +0000, you wrote:
>
>
>In response to a thread which began a couple days ago, I
>suggested that
> > If anyone is interested in getting over such arrogance, one
> > worthwhile way to do it is to consider how 'they' might *get a
>notion
> > of what a root server system is.
>
>Bill Lovell now declares that
>
>> this imbroglio has run its course: you demand what you want of your
>> customers, others can do their thing their way, and we'll see how
>> it all comes out, huh?
>>
>
>which demonstrates not only how little like conversation email is,
>but how to actively prevent it from even being useful.
>
>Did I 'demand' that anyone stop what he's doing? No, in fact I was
>saying that what he or she *already does can be seen to have an
>'educational' (is propedeutic a better word?)
Well of course it is, if you want to be a pretentious ass.
aspect. This may
>make some people uncomfortable (tho Im surprised to see it in a
>lawyer), but it does seem to be the unexamined alternative way to
>understand the kind of question Richard asked:
Just because attorneys have language skills don't expect all of them
to wallow in that fact, or participate in puerile drivel.
Happy now?
Bill Lovell
