>Yet more nonsense.  We don't have yet have ANYTHING AT ALL in the way
>of Internet Governance.  In fact what we have is a tiny, underfunded,
>powerless, non-profit being pushed by the USG against a ruthless and
>clever monopoly with a huge wad of monopoly cash and an army of
>lawyers and lobbyists.  That's what we really have, when you blow
>away the smoke.  Oh.  I almost forgot -- we also have a bunch of high
>minded babble about Internet Governance to entertain us while the
>only *real* prospect of honest, responsible Internet Governance is
>crushed before our eyes. 

Yadda yadda yadda. What you really have is a shadowy bunch that want
to do what they accuse their critics of - control.

ICANN has fooled less people than IAHC did, which is remarkable really.

http://dns.vrx.net/news/by_date/old/1995/Mar/aiken.html
http://dns.vrx.net/news/by_date/old/1995/Mar/cerfdeal.html
http://dns.vrx.net/news/by_date/old/1995/Oct/isocplan.html
http://dns.vrx.net/news/by_date/old/1995/Nov/isocrfc.html
http://dns.vrx.net/news/by_date/1996/Jan/ymbk.html

Oh, and how come you couldn't find a way to get the ITU
into the ASO as well as on the PSO, DNSO and GAC?


--
Richard Sexton  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | http://dns.vrx.net/tech/rootzone
http://killifish.vrx.net    http://www.mbz.org    http://lists.aquaria.net
Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada,  70 & 72 280SE, 83 300SD   +1 (613) 473-1719

Reply via email to