>This issue came up on early Usenet and got clarified. Where ? >Those sites that wanted to be private, couldn't be on Usenet. > >Once one was on Usenet, one announced one's site, agreed >to be part of the communication with others etc. > >Usenet was a public entity. Nope. Usenet is a common private trust. There's absolutley nothing public about it. I'd love to see some evidence it was public. This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of dollars to send everywhere. Please be sure you know what you are doing. Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Mark Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Brian C. Hollingsworth
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Ronda Hauben
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Ronda Hauben
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Ronda Hauben
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Gene Marsh
- Re: [IFWP] Internet stability Ronda Hauben
