Re: [IFWP] [Fwd: Generalisimo Sola (DNSO) rebuffed.. was: [ga] Santiago DNSO GA Chair]

[Planet Communications Computing Facility]

On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Brian C. Hollingsworth wrote:

> Jeff and Everyone,
> 
>   Mr. Sola's demeanor and attitude has not gone unnoticed by many in the
> EU and EC of late.  Some private discussions that I have had have
> expressed much dismay in his attitude and deliberance of dictating
> "Edicts" as if he were some sort of "Royal Line".  I tend to agree
> with Jeff's and I have noticed of late, others characterization of
> Mr. Sola a "Generalisimo", as likely appropriate.  It may be time for

I understand now why they call him a generalisimo.  But the term is
misused.  If Mr. Sola is confused in this way, the spanish call such
confusion an "affection" which usually references a brain ailment.

I don't think we should be slandering Mr. Sola in this way.  Generalisimo
brings back memories of that great personage Franco, a man of power, a man
for women.  There are very few men left in the world with such claims, and
certainly Mr. Sola is no exception.

If you want to continue insulting Mr. Sola maybe you should hit him below
the belt and call him Ms. or Madam Sola.  But attacking an individuals
sexuality is also not a nice thing.  Maybe it's best if we put our anger
in our pockets and just call him Mr. Sola.

Regards
Jeff Mason

--
Planet Communication & Computing Facility           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Access Internet Research Publisher           1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033