>Thank you - and none taken that way Jay, I assure you. I see your point,
>but don't necessarily agree. OK, editors etc are the conduits through which
>the ICANN story must flow, and cortrect me if I'm wrong, you're saying
>they're not letting the story get out because they're part of a conspiracy
>to suppress the truth, whatever that may be in this case? Is that your
>point, or have I over simplified it?
Well, lok at it this way, how many years has it taken to
convince a very smalll handful of reporters that "things
are not as they seem" (Maybe Gordon will recoup the
first time I called him) yes we've been unable to
educate any editors.
This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire
civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of
dollars to send everywhere. Please be sure you know what you are doing.
Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]
