At 01:51 PM 8/7/99 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote: > > >> > What is truly unfortunate is that despite repeated requests you have not >> > addressed the substance of Karl's statements. >> > >> > ICANN willingly and knowingly violated its' own bylaws with the >> > ICANN Interim CEO and counsel present in taking actions to have certain >> > individuals forcibly ejected from a teleconference. Why? >> >> Because ICANN is supposed to respond to public input, and >> overwhelming public input was received that ICANN should revisit its >> earlier position regarding NSI. > > >Please show us that "overwhelming public input". > >You won't. That's because you can't. That "public input" simply does not >exist. If you'll check, you'll see this is pretty much only the IAHC folks. This doesn't mean it's not legitimate, but it is only one small group. As you said above, this oevrwhelming public comment should be demonstrated (if it can be). This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of dollars to send everywhere. Please be sure you know what you are doing. Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]
