At 01:29 PM 8/13/99 -0400, Craig McTaggart wrote:
>A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
><snip>
>
>> Furthermore, ICANN's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
>> were written in such a fashion as to obligate ICANN's Board of
>> Directors to "...carry...out its activities in conformity
>> with relevant principles of international law and applicable
>> international conventions..." as "advised" by ICANN.
>
>Sounds sensible to me. (Do you mean as advised by GAC?) I suppose ICANN
>could carry out its activities in contravention of relevant principles of
>international law and applicable international conventions, but entities
>which do so find that they can't do it for long.
Oh, come on. NSI has been operating in contravention of existing law
since the day it initiated its domain name dispute policy, so why
should ICANN do any differently?
Bill Lovell
