>>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:13:06 EDT
>>
>>Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Subject: A dilemma
>>
>>Body: Randy Bush and I have a dilemma. We have worked together in helping
>to
>>organize the NCDNHC and we are committed to its future growth and
>>representation. We both firmly believe in the geographic diversity and
>>representation of this Constituency. Both of us have been asked by many
>>people (privately) to run to Names Council. Unfortunately, we are both
>>overcommitted and I have a 16 month old son.
>>
>>We were wondering how you would feel about a shared position -- in which
>>Randy and I would run together and, if we were to win, share a seat (we
are
>>both in the US)?
>>
>>Frankly, it is the only way that I would be able to participate on the
>Names
>>Council.
>>
>>Kathy Kleiman
>>ACM-IGC


Sat, 14 Aug 1999 18:24:47 -0400
                             Author:
                                     Milton Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                             Subject:
                                     Re: A dilemma
                               Body:
                                     Kathy and Randy:
                                     I would say that the answer to 
your dilemma is:

                                     One of you has to run as the 
candidate, but that one can in effect
                                     "contract" with the voters, as a 
"campaign promise," to appoint the other
                                     as alternate whenever necessary.

                                     Just checked the DNSO bylaws and 
there is no explicit obstacle to either
                                     one of you appointing the other 
as your alternate.

                                     There is, however, a problem with 
what you call a "shared" position:

                                     Section 2
                                     (g) No more than one officer, 
director or employee of a corporation or other
                                     organization (including its 
subsidiaries and affiliates) shall serve on the NC at
                                     any given time.

                                     Also, it does make a difference 
whether Kathy is running
                                     and promising to make Randy 
alternate when necessary,
                                     or whether Randy is the candidate 
and is promising to make
                                     Kathy the alternate. You two are 
not identical twins....voters
                                     have a right to know which one 
they are voting for.

                                     One of you has to be "the" 
candidate and take responsibility
                                     for the position.

                                     In terms of one person offering 
support and advice to the other,
                                     well of course that's possible 
and desirable. It would happen in any
                                     event, no? You don't need any 
permission from anyone to do that.

                                     > At 01:13 PM 8/13/99 EDT, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
                                     > >>>We were wondering how you 
would feel about a shared position -- in which
                                     > >>>Randy and I would run 
together and, if we were to win, share a seat (weare
                                     > >>>both in the US)?

                                     --
                                     m i l t o n m u e l l e r // m u 
e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
                                     syracuse university 
http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet            Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA  http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)           The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
****************************************************************

Reply via email to