Re: [IFWP] ANNOUNCE: ICANN-Santiago Remote Participation

[Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law]

I was (too subtly?) hinting that they should write their messages out
and be subject to the same word and
interest-in-the-eye-of-the-filtering-authority  limit. Only fair?  

PS. Is the time limit based on the equivalent of 250 words?  Or is the
250 words based on the time limit?  Or neither?

On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Diane Cabell wrote:

> The Chair uses a timer for physical speakers.
> dc
> 
> Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ben Edelman wrote:
> > >
> > > That said, there will be two new rules about remote comments.  First, that
> > > no comment can be longer than a length still to be decided but likely about
> > > 250 words.  We don't intend to be mean about this -- but longer comments are
> >
> > So long as the same rule is imposed on physically present speakers, I have
> > no major objection.
> >
> 
> Diane Cabell
> http://www.mama-tech.com
> Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
> Boston, MA
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                 -->   It's hot and humid here.   <--