Sunday, August 22, 1999, 8:38:23 AM, Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kent and all,
> I would strongly disagree with Kent and Jonathan's tally as presented
> by Jonathan in his post, http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01037.html
> to which Kent refers. I do so as I have the proxies of all of our [INEGroup]
> members, and I voted for them, per their request, for option 2 with
> an amendment to the wording and posted that to the IFWP, Domain Policy
> WG-C mailing list as such. Hence I contend that Jonathan either did not
> recognize this fact, or ignored it. I will be happy to reproduce or copy
> our post with our vote to that extent should clarification be required
> or requested....
There is no proxy participation in the Working Groups, and you are
well aware of this fact. The working group list is restricted to
posts only from members of that list, and is not a general comment
list accepting postings from everyone. This is a Good Thing(tm).
--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org
