>> >I believe that many people on working committees simply do not find e-mail
>> >adequate to the task.
>>
>> If it wasn't adequate, the Internet would not exist; it's how we
>> got this far.
>
>The Net is in awfully early days of its use outside of academic and largely
>US/English language settings. You seem to be saying that what was good enough
>for the Wright Brothers is good enough for today's air traveller. I don't buy
>it, and I find e-mail far less efficient a means of communication than
>face-to-face meetings.
No. You only get participation from people at the F2F meeting - this is
terribly constrained; money and time limits peoples participation.
Email dialogue isn't perfect, but it's better than anything else.
(No, I'm not going to come to Boston to discuss this with you :-)
--
This program posts news to thousands of machines throughout the entire
civilized world. Your message will cost the net hundreds if not thousands of
dollars to send everywhere. Please be sure you know what you are doing.
Are you absolutely sure that you want to do this? [ny]