exactly - thanks for your support

On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Jeff Williams wrote:

> JEffM and all,
> 
>   I feel the same way here Jeff, and have stated so on more than
> one occasion.  However I do not censor anyone as a matter of
> practice.  I try to respect everyone's input, whether I like their input
> or not, is not really relevant.
> 
> Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote:
> 
> > I understand now.  Mark complained to me and i told him to go ahead and
> > filter me out.  It's all in my email.  But Mark felt compeled to begin his
> > complaining in public - even though I feel I have adequately dismissed his
> > complaint.
> >
> > I posted the private email - simply because I have no need to repeat
> > myself again.  I am a firm believer that you say what you mean and you
> > mean what you say.  Mark did not understand that and I hope you assist him
> > in understanding he has the option to follow my advise.
> >
> > So do you.
> >
> > As I have said before here over and over again - I believe in self
> > censorship, but not in it's imposition.  Feels free to filter me - I feel
> > that the american way - which I support.
> >
> > Regards
> > Jeff Mason
> >
> > --
> > Planet Communication & Computing Facility           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Public Access Internet Research Publisher           1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > basic netiquette jeff mason, if I send you a message to you alone it
> > > generally is because I don't want to take a disagreement into the
> > > public domain.....to take the contents of a private message and make
> > > them public without the permission of the sender is just not
> > > done.....defining private message  as generally one to one.... I can
> > > read the mime email OK.  But many are operating with equipment that
> > > makes this impossible.....  what wrong with doing them a common
> > > courtesy and refraining from it?
> > >
> > > Your early style was not that bad.  But you are picking on the wrong
> > > person in picking on mark langston, so for what ever its worth I am
> > > on the verge of tuning you out.....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Hello Mark:
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Mark C. Langston wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without
> > > > > the prior written consent of the author.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well,
> > > > > I'll go ahead and point out that where I said MTA I of course meant to
> > > > > say MUA.
> > > >
> > > >I don't understand - who's consent would that be?  I'm not sure who's
> > > >permission I have to get.
> > > >
> > > >Regards
> > > >Jeff Mason
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Planet Communication & Computing Facility           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >Public Access Internet Research Publisher           1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
> > >
> > > ****************************************************************
> > > The COOK Report on Internet            Index to seven years of the COOK Report
> > > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA  http://cookreport.com
> > > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)           The only Good ICANN is a Dead ICANN
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
> > > Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
> > > ****************************************************************
> > >
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Contact Number:  972-447-1894
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to