Eric and all,

  No, you said it all here Eric.  This whole thing is a travesty is
about all
I can add...  :(  But I have been expecting something like this from
this
ICANN (Initial?) Interim board.  It is just simply another example of a
direct
attempt to thwart the White Paper...

Eric Weisberg wrote:

> Andrew McLaughlin wrote:
>
> > The ICANN Board of Directors held its third quarterly
> meeting in Santiago,
> > Chile, today.  The Board passed a number of resolutions,
> including the
> > following:
> >
> > ...
> > - Implementation of At Large Membership
> >
>
> "Implementation" is an interesting descriptor for what was
> apparently done.
> Some might call it "newspeak."
>
> I understand that voting will only occur when 5,000 people
> sign up for
> membership.  A small  fraction of that number have
> participated in the
> IFWP/ICANN process, to date.  And, there is nothing for
> individual members of
> ICANN to do but vote for part of the board.  If only 4,999
> sign up, they won't
> get to do that.
>
> The resolution provides:
>
>     1. The At-Large membership shall be geographically
> diverse, broadly
>     representative of the Internet user community, and shall
> consist of at
>     least 5,000 individuals.
>
> And, to make the objective even more difficult to achieve,
> the board
>
>      FURTHER RESOLVED [99.__] that, ...the Board reiterates
> its
>      determination that
>      the At Large membership will ultimately be expected to
> fund its
>      operations (including
>      the election process)...
>
> Considering the history of participation, the limited role
> contemplated for
> members, the likelihood of membership fees (or poll tax) and
> the subject matter
> of the organization, I now feel like the black law professor
> from Harvard who,
> after passing the English literacy test for voting in
> Mississippi in the '50s,
> was tested in Chinese.  He astounded the registrar by
> accurately reading the
> passage upon which he was tested:
>
> "This black man is not going to vote in the state of
> Mississippi."
>
> Does anyone read the board resolution differently?  What
> have I missed?

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


Reply via email to