>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Dan Goodin
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 7 12:46:42 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from central.cnet.com (central.cnet.com [204.162.81.10])
> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32177F01D
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:46:42 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from dang.cnet.com (9.73.10.10.nat.cnet.com [10.10.73.9])
> by central.cnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA13877;
> Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
>Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 09:32:53 -0400
>To: Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Dan Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Press Scrutiny
>Cc: Becky Burr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], Esther Dyson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mike Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Mr. Fenello,
>
>The email you quoted, without permission by the way, does nothing to
>confirm the supposed "coordination" you claim. How are casual chats among
>reporters any different than, say, officials from ICANN, NSI, and the DOC
>discussing the DNS wars over drinks (something that happens from time to
>time)?
>
>At 12:22 PM 9/7/99 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>At 08:22 AM 9/7/99 , Dan Goodin wrote:
>>>Mr. Fenello,
>>>
>>>For the record, no one at News.com has *ever* admitted to coordinating our
>>>coverage with anyone. News.com believes it has provided balanced,
>>>hard-hitting coverage and analysis of DNS controversies.
>>>
>>>At 08:27 PM 9/6/99 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>>>First, I revealed some exchanges that I had with a=20
>>>>reporter at News.com who admitted that the press was=20
>>>>coordinating their coverage, and how they were biasing=20
>>>>their stories to make them favorable to ICANN.
>>>
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Dan Goodin <> Reporter <> CNET=
> News.com
>>> http://www.news.com <> 1160 Battery St. <> San Francisco, CA 94111
>>> voice: 415-364-8176 <> fax: 415-395-9254
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>Hi Dan,
>>
>>Here's the relevant exchange:
>>
>>
>>At 11:37 AM 7/10/99 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>>At 04:37 PM 7/9/99 , Dan Goodin wrote:
>>>>Furthermore, Joe never emails me with opinions on the
>>>>matter. In contrast, I know of at least a half dozen reporters covering
>>>>the NSI/ICANN debate who were not aware you were a paid consultant, and
>>>>they receive lots of opinionated emails from you on the issue. =20
>>>
>>>What reporters are you referring to?
>>
>>At 01:22 PM 7/11/99 , Dan Goodin wrote:
>>>At 11:37 AM 7/10/99 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>>>What reporters are you referring to?
>>>
>>>Courtney Macavinta, Beth Lipton, and reporters at other
>>>nationionally-distributed publications whom I do not have permission to
>>>name. =20
>>
>>At 04:36 PM 7/11/99 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>>At 01:22 PM 7/11/99 , Dan Goodin wrote:
>>>>Courtney Macavinta, Beth Lipton, and reporters at other
>>>>nationionally-distributed publications whom I do not have permission to
>>>>name. =20
>>>
>>>Why am *I* a topic of discussion between
>>>nationally-distributed publications?
>>>
>>>Seems very curious to me!
>>>
>>>FWIW, it has long been observed and rumored
>>>that some coordination of positions is in=20
>>>effect at some of the larger news outlets. =20
>>>Thanks for confirming these suspicions.
>>
>>
>>Frankly, your comments are just the smoking
>>gun. The carcass in the driveway is News.com's
>>(and the rest of the media's) refusal to print=20
>>the "untold" story about ICANN.
>>
>>In closing . . .
>>
>>I find it ironic that the more noise I make=20
>>about the blackout, the more you try and=20
>>justify your silence!=20
>>
>>If News.com were sincere, however, you would=20
>>simply publish "the other perspectives." But=20
>>alas, when all is said and done, your coverage=20
>>has not changed. =20
>>
>>
>>Respectfully,
>>
>>Jay Fenello
>>President, Iperdome, Inc.=A0 770-392-9480
>>-----------------------------------------------
>>What's your .per(sm)? http://www.iperdome.com=20
>>
>>"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is=20
>>ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third,=20
>>it is accepted as self-evident." (Arthur Schopenhauer)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Dan Goodin <> Reporter <> CNET News.com
> http://www.news.com <> 1160 Battery St. <> San Francisco, CA 94111
> voice: 415-364-8176 <> fax: 415-395-9254
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
--
"So foul a sky clears not without a storm" - Shakespeare
