Roberto and all, Publicity has nothing what so ever to do with it. It is a matter of keeping accurate public record. If the DNSO/ICANN cannot even accomplish this minor task, how can anyone expect their to be any reasonable chance of managing the Internet central resources adequately? I certainly looks like another example of purposeful malfeasance on the part of the ICANN (Initial?) Interim Board and the DNSO pNC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Folks, > > As a non-native English speaker ;>), I believe that there is a difference > between "consider" and "approve". > You may "consider" something, and decide not to "approve" it. > THe Board "considered" the application, voted on it, and (unfortunately) did > not "approve" it. > > This said, I am with Joop in asking that more publicity on the DNSO Web site > be granted to the efforts in building an individual DN constituency. > > Regards > Roberto > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William X. Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, 09 September 1999 8:22 AM > > To: Kent Crispin > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re[2]: [ga] the DNSO website > > > > > > Wednesday, September 08, 1999, 11:16:14 PM, Kent Crispin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:59:00PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote: > > > [...] > > >> > > >>> Dear Joop, > > >> > > >>> you are not exactly correct :-) > > >> > > >>> The Board has _not_ ignored the resolution of the GA. > > >>> The resolution was that the board should _concider_ your > > application again, > > >>> which was done. I was present , as you where. > > >> > > >> No, you are not correct, and Joop is. > > >> > > >> The board voted to delay consideration (for the second > > time) till the > > >> next meeting. > > > > > Correction. They considered it enough to delay further > > consideration > > > until the next meeting. You admit they voted on it -- that > > > constitutes consideration at a fairly significant level. > > > > Kent, > > > > If you can't see that voting to NOT consider something is equal to > > practically ignoring it, may I suggest a course in rational and > > logical thought? > > > > > > > > -- > > William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934 > > Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/ > > > > Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list! > > http://www.dnspolicy.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss > > <IDNO MEMBER) http://www.idno.org > > > > Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
