>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from [Dave Crocker
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 19:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 19:15:55 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from postman.bayarea.net (postman.bayarea.net [205.219.84.13])
> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96185F015
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 19:15:54 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from shell2.bayarea.net (shell2.bayarea.net [205.219.84.7])
> by postman.bayarea.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA87699;
> Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
> (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Received: (from dcrocker@localhost)
> by shell2.bayarea.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) id QAA11965;
> Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58
>Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:05:54 -0700
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: please give us substance and not assertions Re: November
> Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical role in
> enabling ICANN
>Cc: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In-Reply-To: <v04210108b3ff069c3525@[192.168.0.1]>
>References: <v04210127b3ff025b5e1d@[207.245.95.183]>
> <v04210106b3fed7621c64@[192.168.0.1]>
> <v04210127b3ff025b5e1d@[207.245.95.183]>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>At 12:27 PM 9/10/99 , Gordon Cook wrote:
>>Hey, we are reasonable enough people to make our own judgements if you
>>senior folk who claim have this specialized knowledge will just be good
>>enough to share it with us. Let us form our own opinions.... which is
>>just a different way of saying to you: please be good enough to defend
>>and debate the assertions that you make.
>
>The information has been publicly shared many times. The problem is that
>the information has been rejected many times, apparently with the feeling
>that those rejecting understand these systems better than those doing the
>explaining. Cliche's about leading horses to water come to mind.
>
>To re-fill the trough, a bit:
>
>The DNS and IP addressing have strictly hierarchical assignment and use,
>with a single authority at each "level" in the hierarchy.
>
>Remove the top of the hierarchy and there is then no structure for
>administering these systems. Given that they are both integral to the
>operation of the net, failure in the process of assigning them will cause
>the Internet to cease function.
>
>fullstop.
>
>d/
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
>Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
>675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
"So foul a sky clears not without a storm" - Shakespeare
