At 11:57 AM 9/11/99 , Cybertelecom wrote: >Discussion of ICANN is outside of the scope of this listserv. Hi Bob, Please approve this posting for CYBERTELECOM-L. Your comments about ICANN are reminiscent of comments on the IETF list. It's a "let's bury our head in the sand" approach. ICANN, by virtue of it being the pending recipient of a transfer of regulatory authority over the global Internet infrastructure from Commerce, most certainly seems to be a topic for discussion on your list. Why you feel otherwise is not abundantly clear. Jay. >There are >LOTS of discuss groups dedicated to this subject matter. Please take your >discussions there. > >Unfortunately I have had to make this request too many times now. Limited >discussion of Dept of Commerce activity regarding DNS is welcome (including >discussion of ICANN). However, since this always seems to collapse into >attacks, flames, and discussions not related to Dept of Commerce activity, I >would like to request that all future posts on Dept of Commerce activity >with respect to DNS be sent to one of the volunteers of the Internet Telecom >Project (myself, Harold Feld, or Ray Everett-Church) for approval. > >Thanks > >-Robert Cannon >CyberTelecom Owner > Respectfully, Jay Fenello President, Iperdome, Inc.� 770-392-9480 ----------------------------------------------- What's your .per(sm)? http://www.iperdome.com "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." (Arthur Schopenhauer)
