At 11:31 AM 9/16/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Either NSI has drastically changed positions,
>or Reuter's is once again employing bias in
>their coverage of the ICANN process!
>
>Here's a recent Reuter's story:
>
>
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/19990912/wr/internet_names_3.html
>>The process has been delayed by wrangling over fees and database
>>access between the Commerce Department, Network Solutions Inc. and
>>the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN),
>>that is meant to oversee the new structure.
>
The Reuters story is not the result of a pre-conceived bias or conspiracy
Jay, it's just a quick re-write of the Dept of Commerce press release with
a couple of sentences added. Probaby took five miniutes max to produce. If
there's bias, it's coming from that.
Nick
_______________________________
Nick Patience
Internet Editor
ComputerWire Inc, New York, NY
T: 212 677 0409 x18 F: 212 677 0463
http://www.computerwire.com
