>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Non-member submission from ["Dr. Nii N. Quaynor"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:22:59 -0400 (EDT)
>
>>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 20:22:58 1999
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from mail.internet.com.gh (mail.internet.com.gh [196.3.64.72])
> by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33535F010
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from sasabonsam.gh.com ([196.3.64.23])
> by mail.internet.com.gh (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA10003;
> Sat, 18 Sep 1999 00:04:12 GMT
>From: "Dr. Nii N. Quaynor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "J. Baptista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "Alejandro Pisanty, DGSCA y FQ, UNAM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "General Assembly of the DNSO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Mark C. Langston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Domain policy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "ARD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "IFWP Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [ga] Nomination of Nii Quaynor
>Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 00:14:36 -0000
>Message-ID: <01bf016a$ca6c0060$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>I will appreciate your support note independently.
>
>However, please, recall that I gave the IDNO the time when it was not on the
>agenda and got a resolution for you. This was largely the drive of the
>NCDNHC. You ought to be grateful. IDNO gained something at Santiago due to
>this.
>
>On the issue of pressure from lawyers you referred to, you need to be more
>specific on the decision ( very little decisions from the chair), the
>change, the motion, the vote, your silence till now etc. Lets not forget
>that the lawyers are part of the GA.
>
>Regards,
>Nii
>
>
>>
>>On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Dr. Nii N. Quaynor wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> >I have no issue with Quaynor's nomination. I am concerned that he not
>>> >allow himself ever to be bullied by the lawyers. The IDNO/ICANN scandal
>>> >in Santiago in which he lost control is the reference I'm reffering to.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> The challenge of the Chair of a complex organization such as the GA is
>not
>>> to take sides but allow allsides to be heard, including the lawyers in
>the
>>> DNSO. Sometimes to be in-control is not to directly control but to
>>> coordinate. I wonder the scandal in reference, however.
>>
>>Please do not misunderstand me. I am not against your nomination, in fact
>>I support it. And I understand the complexities of chairing, and the
>>issue of not taking sides. No objection on that.
>>
>>My concern was when you made a decision, and then the lawyers forced you
>>to reconsider. When a chair makes a decision, it's final.
>>
>>I completely understand the pressures you were under. I was annoyed by
>>the fact a decision was reached by the assembly, and under Robert's that
>>should have been it, as respect the IDNO vote. But the lawyers forced the
>>chair to reconsider the motion made and voted on. The scandal is the fact
>>it happened.
>>
>>Cheers
>>Joe Baptista
>>
>>--
>>Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext.
>1033
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
It's about the process, Stupid!
