On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> Before anyone believes a word this particularly personality in the PCCF
> repertoire spoots off accusing Mr Kelly of acting inappropriately, it should be
> noted that the information mentioned is PUBLICLY available, and this is just
> more evidence of his drivel that is intended to do nothing more than inflame
> and disrupt.
Of course the information is publically available. But please notice the
change of mode. Yesturday according to your PCCF did not exist, and
according to you and a few other personalities I was Richard, and Jeff,
and Frank, and whomever else your derranged minds felt confortable in
associating. But today, all of a sudden PCCF is real, and all of a sudden
- it's documents our part of the official PUBLICLY available record.
Walsh, have you ever had "Spotted Dick", it's an english thing. In any
event I think your a bit of spotted dick.
You see whalsh. The issue is not if the record is PUBLICALLY available,
trhe issue is that membership secretaries of organizations should keep
their big yaps shut. It's no ones business, and it's not their business
to play whore and tell. i don't like this - this was very wrong.
If someone want to go the distance and get at the public record, fine. i
don't expect idno executive members to be pimping private communication
and data on us to everyone without permission, of which they have non.
That's why I don't think your qualified for much. your too much of a busy
body and so is Kelly.
Regards
Joe
>
> the offer for a filtered feed of these lists still holds. It would be trivial
> to setup, and would leave the INEG,PCCF, LAW.COM, and RIZZO personalities to
> talk only to themselves and those who support their games.
>
> This is the harm that anonymous individuals using pen names to participate in
> these lists can do when they are granted unrestricted access.
>
> Some of you may receive this twice. Apologies in advance.
>
>
> On 21-Sep-99 J. Baptista wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Kevin M. Kelly wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Jeff!
> >>
> >> Before you lay your credibility on the line, you may want to note that
> >> PCCF.Net is registered to a Canadian Company. So, PCCF et al. probably does
> >> not pay Mary Wiening's salary.
> >
> > Mr. Kelly:
> >
> > Thank you so much for our privacy. May I point out to you that you are
> > privilaged, by means of your position to have copies of of legal documents
> > of organization. I did not provide you this documentation so that you
> > could disclose it to people who have no business with that information.
> > And to do so in public.
> >
> > I am bringing this to the attention of the GA, and the IFWP as I beleive
> > this reflect badly on the idno's rights to seek position. How dare you
> > sir violate my privacy.
> >
> > As for your assumption of our tax position based on jurisdiction, may I
> > advise you that your out too lunch. only 25% of our operation are in
> > Canada.
> >
> > I'm really pissed off with you Kelly. Your a real twit. When it comes to
> > privacy, to you people it's a cheep pissing contest. Do you really care
> > about the idno, or is it a place to pick up information on the
> > competition.
> >
> > Joop, this is your baby. I smell problems here with existing management.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Joe Baptista
> >
> > --
> > Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext.
> > 1033
>
> --
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
> Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
>
> Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
> http://www.dnspolicy.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss
> <IDNO MEMBER> http://www.idno.org
>
>
