Professor Froomkin and Elisabeth,

  It seems like the current election process for NC members currently
underway is also very distorted.  Could this be a contrived situation?
One wonders.

Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
>
> > Michael,
> >
> > I was explained that when external considerations like geographical
> > diversity (which is essential in ICANN process) are added to the
> > STV algorithm itself, the method became distorted.
>
> Distortions are possible with EVERY type of electoral system.  The issue
> is which sort are most likely, and which are most feared.
>
> Thus without a comparative element, the above statement is true, but very
> incomplete.
>
> >
> > Another point is, that every mathematical method had border
> > considerations.
>
> Yes, including first past the post.
>
> > I believe the electorate size shall have some minimum to be
> > considered for STV, otherwise it is meaningless.
>
> This is completely contrary to what I have read (and written).  Do you
> have a source for this?
>
> > There should be at least two parameters to be taken into
> > account simultaneously:
> >         some ratio between Number-of-people-to-be-elected
> >         to Electorate-size *and* Electorate-size
> > to have some mathematical significancy.
> >
>
> Yes. STV meets these criteria.
>
> > Last not the least, the understanding of voting procedure
> > by everybody is essential -- and this is not a case for STV.
> >
>
> If the NC cannot understand the voting system, they are in the wrong job.
> We are not talking about a masssive group here.  It can be explained in
> five to ten minutes.
>
> > Elisabeth
> >
>
> --
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                  -->   It's warm and damp here.   <--

Respectfully,

--
Brian C. Hollingsworth
Sr. Legal Advisor, International House of Justice Internet
Communications  Affairs and Policy
Advisory council for Public Affairs and Internet Policy, European
Union


Reply via email to