That's "libel", Ken, not "liable". And thats "they're = they are", not "their", Joe. Carry on the good work. You both make me proud. At 09:50 PM 9/27/99 -0400, you wrote: >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 27 21:50:56 1999 >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: from digimail.digitel.net (unknown [209.141.56.25]) > by ns1.vrx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B331FF16A > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:50:55 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from kenstubbs ([209.26.29.33]) by digimail.digitel.net > (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# LND-1997L) > with SMTP id AAA167; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:24:33 -0400 >Message-ID: <012d01bf0953$54e51ca0$02000003@kenstubbs> >From: "Ken Stubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "J. Baptista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: response >Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:46:46 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 > > >> Now - with respect to myself, you know I'm real - and have a very >> respectable background. You also know we expect you to shut your mouth in >> respect of it. > >it is exactly for that reason that i include you with this esteemed group > > >> >> What I object to here, is you lumping me in with a group that is unknown >> with the intent of causing me libel by association, and you know better. > >you dont need anyone to liabel you , you do it with your own actions. > >ken stubbs > > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sometimes you have to have patience with things that annoy you." -Xena, "Xena: Warrior Princess"
