At 12:52 AM 9/30/99 +1200, you wrote:
Reminds me of a thing I read in the Oregonian today: In this
one country, the penalty for voting against the death penalty
was . . . the death penalty.
Bill Lovell
>At 07:39 AM 29/09/1999 -0400, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>>i am curious here joop
>>
>>please show me anything in the ICANN bylaws that is similiar to the article
>>you are discussing below?
>>who defines what "harm" is ?
>>
>Hello Ken,
>
>The article can be found at the IDNO website, still reacheable at
>www.idno.org/organiz.htm
>This article came into being when the newborn IDNO had to protect itself
>from "members" who's goal was not to help the IDNO forward.
>It has never been applied.
>It is not something that ICANN had to worry about. Not yet. It is
>something it does worry about when it has to come up with a membership.
>
>In case action needs to be taken against a member, a Fair Hearing panel
>will be called into being to hear all sides and determine the extent of the
>harm.
>
>
>
>
>--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
>the Cyberspace Association,
>the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
>http://www.democracy.org.nz/idno/
>
