"Sr. Francisco Fanego" wrote:
> What power does the GA actually have? I know I'm treadibng on sacred
> ground, but honestly,
> you guys have always had your "cup of tea" + newsreal; how can you hope
> to make a come back?
>
> Francisco
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Vany and all,
> >
> > Any determination of a "GA Chair" should pass the muster of a GA
> > membership vote for ratification.
> >
> > Vany Martinez wrote:
> >
> > > Hi to all:
> > >
> > > >We need also to take into account the ICANN Bylaws,
> > > > http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm
> > > >Article VI, Section 2
> > > > (i) The NC shall elect the Chairman of the GA annually
> > > So then you answered my question: Of course NC have the
> > > decision of the GA Chair in their hands.
> > >
> > > >I would suggest the GA prepares for election of the 5 members
> > > >for the AdCom, make a call for nominations, find more than
> > > >5 candidates (ideally 2 or 3 from each region would be fine)
> > > >willing to run for AdCom position for one year, 2000.
> > > >Then the NC could vote for the GA Chairman among those
> > > >nominees, and once the Chair choosen, the GA could decide about
> > > >the reminding 4 members of the AdCom (in this order, because
> > > >the geographic region of the elected Chair will impact on
> > > >the 4 members of the AdCom).
> > > That's why I suggested the "practically complicated" procedure
> > > for having GA Chairman. This ensure the participation of this
> > > position of the 5 ICANN regions all in one year. But since
> > > election of the GA Chair is up to NC, then I suggest the NC
> > > work in how they will deal with the issue of geographic
> > > diversity unless GA agreed that the GA Chairman should be rotated
> > > every year between the different 5 regions every year. The only
> > > disadvantage that maybe some can find in this is that in the
> > > worst situation, a region have to wait 5 years to have a person
> > > serving as a GA Chair.
> > >
> > > Knowing that in fact NC is the one who elects GA Chairman, then
> > > definitively the GA AdCom might not be integrated by a NC
> > > delegate. I think that such person should be a link, and maybe
> > > the formula that others proposed already about having this
> > > person with voice without vote in the AdCom should work.
> > > The only way that such sixth member from the NC in the GA AdCom
> > > has full rights is that ICANN bylaws changes towards
> > > having also three GA delegates in the NC with full rights also.
> > >
> > > >Look like collective work, taking into account both
> > > >the Bylaws and the GA will.
> > > Yes, you are right.
> > >
> > > >Some recent experience indicate that it would be wise to
> > > >have a replacement for any position, i.e. not only
> > > >5 AdCom, but also alternates.
> > > The same thinking I have also.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Vany
> > >
> > > Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
> > > Especialista en Tecnologia de Informacion/Asistente Administrativa
> > > Programa Red de Desarrollo Sostenible/Panama
> > > Tel. (507) 230-4011 ext 213, (507) 230-3455
> > > Fax: (507) 230-3646
> > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> Sr. F. Fanego, Director
> Centro Planetario de Communicacion y Computacion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Planet Communications & Computing Facility (212) 894-3704
> ext. 1033
--
Sr. F. Fanego, Director
Centro Planetario de Communicacion y Computacion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planet Communications & Computing Facility (212) 894-3704 ext.
1033
