David and all, Of course you are quite correct here. There seems to be some glaring misconceptions of what the DNSO election process ending on October 8th. As we have all seen clearly this process has been a exercise in gross cronyism that has been pointed out by yourself and others on several occasions, yet we see that the oversight from the ICANN (Initial?) Interim board is either nonexistent or they are turning a blind eye, so to speak. We have also seen no oversight on the part of the NTIA to date in this DNSO game, and this gives the appearance on lack of ability of the NTIA to manage this process adequately and in accordance with the White Paper as well as the MoU. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Roberto and everybody else, > > Roberto, it seems that you have not been paying very close > attention. Rick White is not a member of the GA and as such > cannot be nominated or elected in accordance with the DNSO > bylaws and the procedure at www.dnso.org for the questionable > election process. Als he is an elected government official and as such > under the ICANN bylaws cannot hold any office in ICANN or any > of it's SO's. > > David "Dude" Jenson > > In a message dated 99-10-12 04:05:20 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << Subj: RE: [ga] Fwd: ICANN prepares a Congressional fix with Rick > White's GIP inspired candidacy > Date: 99-10-12 04:05:20 EDT > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mikki, > You wrote (on behalf of Gordon Cook, who reads in copy): > > > > >> > > >>As ICANN moves to break its by laws one more time by nominating and > > >>then placing ex congressman Rick White on its board lets look one > > >>more time at its origins. > > >> > > I must have missed something. > > How is it that Rick White's nomination is considered to break ICANN's laws? > > What I see at http://www.dnso.org/nominees/rwh.html is a list of more than > 10 supporters. Provided that they are either subscribed to GA-List or any of > the other lists that give the right to nominate/support (and that should be > easily verifyable - probably it has already been done by DNSO-Listadmin), > the nomination looks perfectly legal to me. > > A different question is how comes that a candidate is coming out of the > blue, supported by a (small) list of people that for the most part have > never posted a single message to the GA so far. But that's life. > Let's be clear: I am not supporting at all Rick White as candidate, and > personally think that his election is not in the best interest of the > Internet, but I am not willing to endorse the fraud theory, unless proven. > So, please, if you have elements that prove the fraud, please present them > before the election is done, in the interest of us all. If you don't, feel > free to continue in your campaign, but don't expect to be listened. > > Regards > Roberto > > >> Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
