karl and all, Well said Karl. And I completely agree. Yet I have yet to see from you any outrage at the fact that the DNSO Admin has yet to allow DNSO GA members that are currently blocked from posting and have been since Aug. 7th. WHy is this Karl? I don't really mean to put you on the spot, but let's get real shall we? >;) Karl Auerbach wrote: > The IDNO, having petitioned to be a DNSO constituency, is as involved with > domain name matters as the other groups that were automatically > grandfathered into the GA for purposes of making nominations. > > I certainly don't see anything wrong with correcting that flaw by > suggesting to IDNO members that they get involved with the GA. > > And if you examine the archives, you have not seen me complaining about > others who have also increased the size, and hence, the representation and > diversity of the GA. > > I'm a supporter of full participation by everybody. I think anybody who > has an interest in these matters, not just GA "members" ought to have not > merely a role in nominating, but also of electing. > > I do, however, would think that having a clear "record" date to establish > the nominating/voting body would be a good thing. > > --karl-- Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!) CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact Number: 972-447-1894 Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
