There is no consensus. As for sending email to all internet users - humm!
200 million users (estimated and growing daily). Have fun.
Control of the dns infrastructure is in the hands of those who control the
root cache. Not ICANN. ICANN is an experiment in comedy, and a fine one
at that.
The ga has seen consensus in it's support of Nii. I felt Nii was a bit
too sweet to play chairman, but of all the candidates in my opinion he was
the finest. An honourable man, well educated, sincere, and diplomatic. I
was very pleased to support him and see he had considerable support here.
Nii was also a great color - he's black. A politically correct color code
with brains. And what happens, he get's trashed. Maybe Dr. Nii was the
wrong color for the board - because he certainly had the brains and
support to get in. Dr. Nii, as a white representative of the european
race I formerly appologise for my white brothers and sisters, wrong colour
dr. nii - i didn't know there was a clash.
You entire consesus question is irrelevant. This is the finest
dictatorship I have ever seen. Like all internet dictatorships, the rise
will be swift, the fall merciful.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Joseph Friedman wrote:
> At 07:05 PM 10/15/1999 -0500, Peter Veeck wrote:
>
>
> >Per Koelle wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Joseph Friedman wrote:
> > >
> > > > Governing authority on the Internet has always been derived from
> > consensus,
> >
> >So how about an email to all Internet users to see if there is a consensus for
> >goverence.
>
> If there is a consensus for governance? There must be some sort of governance.
>
> --Joseph
>
