Mikael - I agree with the general points you have expressed here. But
let's set the record straight. Children in Florida, Cornwall and Toronto
were raped. There will be no investigation into these allegations. The
investigation has been buried by the Ontario Government (CANADA) via it's
protector of child molesters - someone I can not mention due to the court
order of Judge Brown.
In fact, when I was sued for libel - by the individual who's name I can
not mention - due to the court order of judge brown - with respect to
these very issues, the court of Judge Brown, denied the the right to
trial or defense.
On my appeal, which incidentally was fully paid for by a Mr. Mark Savary -
who launders money on behalf of the Ontario mob/bikers, the court admitted
that I was denied a defense, that there where irregularies - but it's
didn't matter much anyway according to the court, and my right to trial
was again trashed.
Justice in the province of Ontario, and most of Canada with respect to
crown officers, does not exist.
The investigation of this matter stopped in Florida, there will be no
further investigation, unless people demand it. And then I assure you it
will be handled in a manner so as to bury it further. A most unfortunate
state of affairs.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communication & Computing Facility 212.894.3704 x1033
Public Access Internet Research Publisher 419.821.8581 fax
Centro Planetario de Communicaciones y Computacion 888.830.5744 x3223
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Mikael Pawlo wrote:
> /Sorry for this spam, but I felt I had to reply to all to whom Jeff
> Williams sent his mail when I was quoted in his mail./
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > > Yes, you do.
> > > Is he charged with anything? If so - what? How will such an allegation
> > > affect his work for ICANN?
> > No he has yet to be charged with any specific charges to date. But
> > there is an open investigation. I think it is quite clear as to how this
> > would
> > and could affect anyone's work for ICANN. It is amazing to me that you
> > could even ask such a question. :(
>
> I have just one quick comment: whatever happened to "innocent until proven
> guilty"?
>
> You continue:
> > Understand I am not saying that he is guilty of anything, but the suspicion
> > alone is sufficient to disqualify him as a ICANN BoD member. It is up
> > to a court of law to determine his guilt of innocence at some point in time.
>
> You say that he's under suspicion and therefore should not be able to
> run for ICANN. I beg to differ. I have no understanding for pedophiles
> whatsoever, I might even consider severe punishment not even available in
> Sweden for such creatures. However, I think we'll create quite an
> impossible situation if the shadow of a doubt or a suspicion would
> automatically disqualify board members. If a board member is charged or
> convicted he should probably be removed due to lack of confidence. Since
> ICANN board participation is an assignment where confidence is important,
> a charge against a board member probably should be sufficient for removal,
> but a suspicion only should not be enough. If so - we could probably not
> elect any board member.
>
> I won't argue my point further - you either see it or not.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mikael
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> ICQ:35638414 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pawlo.com/
>
