At 12:02 PM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Esther,
>
>>It seems to me that if you read each word very carefully,
>> he's saying: no *monopoly* TLDs, not "no competitive TLDs."
>
>As an administrative executive of a decision making
>entity, he probably should not be saying anything.
>Only three of the 250 TLD zones are not "monopolies" and
>unlikely to change significantly. ICANN seems intent
>on holding on to its monopoly root zone.
>
>So clearly we're dealing with a mixed environment
>where the best stance of an ICANN spokesperson is
>neutrality on the matter.
>
>--amr
Oh really ? Damn. I was *SO* looking forward to "sharing"
.ARPA.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I see you've got yout fist out. Say your peace and get out. Guess
I get the gist of it, but... it's alright. Sorry that you feel that
way. The only thing there is to say is to say: ever silver lining
has a touch of grey" - JG.
