On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> It's an the equivalent of an orbs relay test for nameservers.If it was
> anybody else doing it it might even be construed as productive. This
> isn't the case as Baptista has an acute credibility deficiency. This is
> probably a result of his own antics, which I know have gotten him
> at the very least into my own killfile and I'm not exactly a trendsetter
> in that department.
Credibility is irrelevant. It's about facts. Facts don't lie.
Credibility is for those of the old school - and look at the mess the dns
is in.
Credibility is for fools and governments. What we need is a future. What
is happening today - with all this spam nonsense, is that people no longer
take the initiative to communicate - and that's screwing all of us up.
That's why we did it - because it needed to be done. And were the only
ones with the guts to do it and kick the establishment in the balls - and
smile - all at the same time. You know us. Who - long ago - told the
people of ontario they were to lose access rights to government and then
delivered - humm ;-)
Facts. PCCF stands for FACTS - and not the fiction I've seen here these
past few years. FACTS.
> Also for the record: my report didn't list easyDNS nameservers, the report
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] only reported on 5 other nameservers that are
> specified in domains that have easydns nameservers as *their* primaries.
>
> Telling it like it is...
Well that's good. This interest me this last bit. If you want to pursue
it, i'd be interested in the server names (privately) so i can cross check
it.
Our data was mainly from root server zone transfers. Let me know.
Cheers
Joe Baptista
P.S. I don't remember you - who are you? You met me? Are you the one
who created my newsgroup for me - the one I never use - but ocassionally
chase spammers out of?
