Jean and all,

  Without good process there can be no good substance.  We all already
know that the DNSO and BoD elections held by the DNSO were
phony and fraudulent.  That is now well documented.

  Participation on the internet, means just that.  Participation on the
Internet.  Personal appearances are not necessary nor have any of the
venues been adequate to accommodate our members (98k+), so for all
of us to participate would not have been possible in the first place.  Hence
electronic or internet participation is both prudent and necessary.  No hiding
is involved.  David, as myself or yourself have E-Mail addresses to identify
ourselves.  This is both adequate and is also part of the ICANN Bylaws
as well as the White Paper.  Therefore I am at a loss to find relevance in your
comment that seems to be contrary in it's nature.

  Thank you again for your cooperation in advance.  >;)

Jean-Michel Becar wrote:

> First of all, the GA does not elect the Chair but the NC. SO no need to
> discuss further, please we are all spending our time here to read mails
> complaining about process instead of trying to make things better.
>
> About censorship, how can you defend the behavior of Baptista !!!!!! This
> was unacceptable at all, and I'm wondering how a such person is able to post
> so many messages per day! Who is paying him to do that? Who has such free
> time to spent all day to write spam and insulting emails? Why don't you come
> to meetings and stand up in front of all of us and say that you think in
> public instead of hiding behind unanimous emails!!!!!
>
> So let's go for the nomination of the GA chair.
>
> Jean Michel B�car
> E.T.S.I. Project Manager
> Tel:    +33 (0)4 92 94 43 15
> Fax:    +33 (0)4 92 38 52 15
> GSM:    +33 (0)6 82 80 19 31
> www.etsi.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 11 November 1999 21:39
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Call for Nominations
> >
> >
> > Jonathan and everybody else,
> >
> >   Jonathan, I agree with your second suggestion completely,
> > but not your
> > first.
> >
> >   It seems to me that in order to have free and open
> > elections one cannot
> > predispose any qualifications as a part of that election
> > process.  Hence
> > my disagreement with your first suggestion.
> >
> >   As to your second suggestion, I am in complete agreement with it.
> > However it does require that this seeming SELECTIVE CENSORSHIP
> > of the DNSO Mailing list must cease for proper elections to
> > occur.  This
> > has not been accomplished to date.
> >
> > David "Dude" Jenson
> >
> > In a message dated 11/11/99 12:02:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > << I believe that the first step in developing nomination
> > procedures should
> >  include potential candidates posting a statement of interest
> > and a list of
> >  credentials that they believe qualify them to serve as
> > General Assembly
> >  Chair in the DNSO.
> >
> >  Additionally, We then need to develop a procedure by which
> > the GA can vote
> >  on perspective candidates and elect nominees. I submit that
> > there needs to
> >  be an impartial collection of votes to insure the integrity
> > of this process.
> >  Further, I suggest that the top five nominees from the GA be
> > submitted to
> >  the Names Council for consideration.
> >   >>
> >

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


Reply via email to