Kent and all,
Kent's logic is again as usual, flawed. His conclusion doesn't follow.
We DON'T have competing REGISTRIES. What we have is
multiple REGISTRARS, with only one Registry. Hence his logic flaw.
Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 07:39:34PM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> > At 03:02 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > >On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> > >
> > >> Doesn't matter. At least we have COMPETITION in the domain registration
> > >> business. You're NO LONGER LOCKED IN and the STABILITY OF THE
> > >> INTERNET is no longer at risk.
> > >>
> > >> The fact your domain dosn't work is a small price to pay.
> > >
> > >How is this any different from when NSI ran things exclusively?
> >
> > It's not. That's my point. Poeple compained one company
> > gave them shitty service. Now a whole bunch of companies
> > give shitty service.
> >
> > What can we conclude from this, class ?
>
> Premise: Having many companies doesn't help service.
>
> Conclusion 1: Competition doesn't work.
>
> Conclusion 2: Multiple competing registries won't help service.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
