>I believe one of the reasons we are in Year 2 of ICANN without an At Large
>membership is because that membership was defined too broadly. That
You mean you don't think I should be able to walk across the street
to the Bannockburn general store and tell old Harry that he's a voting
member of internet government?
Limit it it to nameserver owners. That's who it's supposed to be
coordinating isn't it? (Like they ever asked to be coordinated).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
- Mark Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN membership ... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN membersh... Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN membersh... A.Gehring
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN memb... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN ... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from IC... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN ... A.Gehring
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from IC... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from IC... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from ICANN ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Key quotes and ideas from IC... Jeff Williams
