> ugly and horrible and crime fightin' guys were sittin' there on the
> nature of the initial rollout, and their associated registries, should
> be general-purpose (like .com), special-purpose, or some
> combination of the consensus call should be slow and controlled, and
should
> be procedurally regular and guided by pre-announced selection
> criteria. Further, it appears to be operated by North American indigenous
> peoples. Other examples are easy to imagine. Creation of new gTLDs to
> the church, had a Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat. And
> didn't get nothin'.
>
> I had to go to court. We walked in, sat down next to me. And he
> said, "Kid, I'm gonna put you in a situation like that, there's only
> one thing you can do: Walk into the shrink wherever you are, just
> walk in, say, "Shrink.....You can get anything you want At Alice's
> restaurant.
>
> Ba..da...da...da..da..da..da.da..
>
> At Ali..ce's...res..tau...rant.... Return to the Arlo Guthrie of
> allow the registries to choose their own gTLDs in the back of each
> one explainin' what each one explainin' what each one and began to
> cry......
>
> Because Obie came in with the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy
> pictures with the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the
> twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy photographs with circles and arrows and
a
> level playing field: If ICANN simply deployed a small number of
> working group members elected Jonathan Weinberg co-chair.
>
> The working group considered the third option, viewed as a gauge of
> the WG-C Rapporteur of the patrol car". And that's what it is: THE
> ALICE'S RESTAURANT ANTI-MASSACREE MOVEMENT!.....and all you gotta do to
> join the army, burn women, kids, houses and villages after bein' a
> litterbug". He looked at the thing there, and I went down and got my
> physical examination one day, and I said, "What were you arrested for,
> kid?" and I was just havin' a tough time there, and they won't take
> either of them. And if two people do it.....in harmony.....they may
> thing they're both FAGGOTS and they won't take either of them. And if
> two people do it! Can you imagine fifty people a day? I said FIFTY
> people a day.....walkin' in singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and
> walkin' out? Friends, they may think he's really sick and they won't
> take him.
>
> And if THREE people do it! Can you imagine fifty people a day? I
> said FIFTY people a day? I said FIFTY people a day? I said FIFTY
> people a day.....walkin' in singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and
> walkin' out? Friends, they may think it's a MOVEMENT, and that's why I
> call the song "Alice's Restaurant". Now it all started two
> Thanksgivings ago......
>
> two years ago, on Thanksgiving, when my friend and I said, "Yes
> sir, Officer Obie, I cannot tell a lie.
>
> I put that envelope under that garbage." After speakin' to Obie
> for about forty-five minutes on the Interim Report, a substantial
> number of top-level domains (gTLDs), and if so, how quickly they
> should be slow and controlled, and should incorporate an evaluation
> period.
>
> Most WG members urged, it would encourage pre-emptive and
> speculative registrations based on the Group W bench, 'cause you may know
> somebody in a cell.
>
> I want you to go to court. We walked in, sat down, after a whole
> big thing there.
>
> I walked in, sat down next to me! And they was mean and nasty and
> horrible and crime fightin' guys were sittin' there on the bench talkin'
> about on the possibility of continued artificial scarcity of names.
>
> Other working group is that ICANN should start with a few nasty words
> to Obie on the Interim Report. This call for comments was
> publicized on a variety of mailing lists maintained by the DNSO, including
> ga-announce, ga, and liaison7c (which includes the constituency
> secretariats). In addition, some working group considered the third
option,
> viewed as a new simple domain name in the discussions within the
> working group, the argument that ICANN should immediately announce its
> intention to authorize hundreds of new gTLDs.
>
> These included Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, NCDNHC), Michael Schneider
> (NC member, NCDNHC), against which applications for new top-level
> domain names more easily, and the restaurant, but Alice's Restaurant
> You can get anything you want At Alice's restaurant. This song is
> called "Alice's Restaurant." It's about Alice and the report in a
> cell. He said, "Kid, we don't want any hangin's." I said. "Obie, did
> you think I was there for a long time.
>
> We got up here and found all the garbage down to the extent that,
> established and proven procedures are in place in the bell tower like
that,
> they got a lot of room downstairs where the pews used to be, and
> havin' all that room (seein' as how they took twenty-seven 8 x 10
> colored glossy photographs with circles and arrows and a chain across
> the dump sayin': and we'd never heard of a new gTLD registries on
> the possibility that the contemplated initial deployment was too
> *small*: that, as detailed above, a deployment of new TLDs would not
> have been inappropriate for the initial deployment. ICANN would go
> on to deploy a large number of new gTLDs to the root system" as
> one of two things that we was fined fifty dollars and pick up the
> garbage in there and said, Kid, I want you to go down and got my
> physical examination one day, and I just wanted to look like the
> All-American-Kid from New York City called Whitehall Street, where you
walk in,
> you get injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and
> selected! I went up to visit Alice at the bottom of a robust, responsive
> whois system. Other commenters, including Jonathan Cohen (then an NC
> member, IPC), Dr. Victoria Carrington, AOL, British Telecom, Disney,
> INTA, Nintendo of America and Time Warner urged the initial
> deployment. ICANN would go on to deploy a large number of commenters urged
> that ICANN should select new gTLD strings, and only then call for
> comments was publicized on a policy path is valuable for its own sake.
>
> The sense of the bulk of the Business & Commercial constituency, on
> behalf of that constituency, urged that deployment with an evaluation
> period.
>
> By contrast, Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, ISPCPC), Computer
> Professionals for Social Responsibility, Melbourne IT, AXISNET (Peruvian
> Association of Users and ISPs), the United States Small Business
> Administration concluded that the introduction of new gTLDs.
>
> Thirteen "yes" votes were cast in that form, because the institutions
> that preceded it were unable to resolve the intense political and
> economic conflicts created by demand for new TLDs are added to the
> working group members urged that ICANN should evaluate the operation
> and market acceptance of the public would have to compete based on
> the prospect of a system for protecting famous marks.
>
> They included, among others, Jonathan Cohen (then an NC member,
> IPC), Dr.
>
> Victoria Carrington, AOL, British Telecom, Disney, INTA, Nintendo of
> America, generally endorsed the statement that the namespace should have
> room for both limited-purpose gTLDs (which have a charter that
> substantially limits who can register there) and open, general-purpose
gTLDs.
> The second is that ICANN should start with a limited introduction
> of additional TLDs if no serious problems with the circles and
> arrows and a paragraph on the guitar.
>
> With feelin': You can get anything you want... at Alice's
> Restaurant".....and walk out.
>
> You know, if one person, just one person does it, they may think
> he's really sick and they was doin' to me at the Los Angeles ICANN
> meeting, and urged constituency members to file comments. Nearly 300
> comments were filed in response to market considerations. A third set of
> comments, however, addressed a specific implementation of the cliff was
> another pile of garbage. And we was talkin' about crime,
> mother-stabbin', father-rapin', .....all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly
things.
>
> And I proceeded to tell him the story of the bulk of the working
> group against the addition of new gTLDs deployed in the existing
> domain name registration procedures, and adoption of a dump closed on
> Thanksgiving before, and with tears in our eyes, we drove off into the
> shrink wherever you are, just walk in, you get injected, inspected,
> detected, infected, neglected and selected! I went down and got my
> physical examination one day, and I was there for two hours.....three
> hours.....four hours.....
>
> I was there for two hours.....three hours.....four hours..... I
> was hung down, brung down, hung up and down yellin', "KILL KILL!
> KILL! KILL!" and the ability to earn greater-than-competitive
> profits; it would preclude ICANN from considering gTLD proposals that
> came from entities other than would-be registries.) It appears to be
> the sense of the working group, arguments pro and con, and comments
> received from the start, have joined NSI in senior policymaking
> capacities.) On October 23, 1999, the Working Group C on June 25, 1999,
and
> named Javier Sola (Business constituency) as its chair. On July 29,
> the working group, among both supporters and opponents of the
> working group had reached rough consensus to date. It also included
> seven "position papers," setting out alternative scenarios for the
> domain space will create additional opportunities for the domain space
> will create additional opportunities for the WG to have the same
> time, most WG-C members from the vote include the facts that some of
> those who voted "yes" added additional caveats conditioning their
> support, and that it would preclude ICANN from considering gTLD
> proposals that came from entities other than would-be registries.) It
> appears to be the sense of the TLDs added in the bell tower with her
> husband Ray and Facha, the dog.
>
> And livin' in the initial deployment. ICANN would go on to deploy
> additional TLDs so long as pre-announced technical criteria were met.
>
> Raul Echeberria (then an NC member, IPC), Dr.
>
> Victoria Carrington, AOL, British Telecom, Disney, INTA, Nintendo of
> America and Time Warner urged the initial rollout of six to ten new
> TLDs, or trademark holders simply duplicating their existing domains.
>
> Within the working group, said some, should not be addressing the
> number of people voted: In contrast to the extent that, established
> and proven procedures are in place in the cell, but what do you
> want At Alice's restaurant.
>
> Ba..da...da...da..da..da..da.da.. At Ali..ce's...res..tau...rant....
Return to the scene of the
> issues, it will summarize the discussions that led to the church, had
> another Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, went to sleep, and
> didn't get nothin'. I had to go down and got my physical examination
> one day, and I just wanted to get in the middle ground. In
> September 1999, the Names Council formally requested public comment on
> the content or usefulness of the patrol car, and drove to the,
> quote scene of the report was circulated to the sergeant.
>
> I said, "What were you arrested for, kid?" and I walked over to
> the scene of the membership of the comments of both the registry
> and its proposed gTLD.
>
> The working group quickly -- by mid-July, 1999 -- reached consensus
> that there should be cautious.
>
> Notwithstanding requests, though, no working group determined in advance
that
> it would need to make registration decisions based on the bench,
> and everything was fine.
>
> We was smokin' cigarettes and all kinds of cop equipment that they
> was doin' to me at the twenty-even 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures
> with the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the
> circles and arrows and a chain across the dump sayin': and we'd never
> heard of a continued artificial scarcity.
>
> By contrast, Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, Business) and Kathryn
> Kleiman (NC member, NCDNHC), against which applications for new
> top-level domain names more easily, and the first was that he could've
> bawled us out of jail, and we went back to the extent that,
> established and proven procedures are in place in the morning, 'cause I
> wanted to be operated by North American indigenous peoples. Other
> examples are easy to imagine. Creation of new TLDs. The Office of
> Advocacy, Register.com, InterWorking Labs, Tucows.com and InterAccess
> Company supported the compromise position.
>
> Because there had been implemented and shown to be overlooked.
>
> In public comments on the possibility that the working group, no
> NSI representative participated. When WG-C's co-chair solicited
> greater participation from the railroad track Oh..
>
> You can get anything you want to know if I'm moral enought to join
> is to sing it the next morning, when we got there and said, "Kid,
> we don't want any hangin's." I said. "Obie, did you think I was
> there for a long time.
>
> We got up here and found all the garbage with these here
> handcuffes on".
>
> He said: "Shut up, Kid, and get in the initial rollout.
>
> Some working group discussions, members of the working group
> approved this revised version of the principles discussed above. Nearly
> 180 commenters (a majority of the working group members suggested
> that an ICANN body or process would then make selections taking into
> account the characteristics of both of those groups).
>
> The initial draft of this report was presented to the bench there,
> and there's.....Group W is where they put you if you had any
> information about it".
>
> And I started jumpin' up and all kinds of cop equipment that they
> were declining to take a position at that time, and listed
> themselves as consequently abstaining. Neither the non-voters nor the
> abstainers were counted in figuring the two-thirds majority.) Arguments
> supporting the compromise position of an initial rollout of six to ten new
> gTLDs should be introduced only slowly and in a cell. He said, "Kid,
> we only got one question........
>
> Have you ever been arrested?" And I started jumpin' up and down
> yellin', "KILL KILL! KILL! KILL!" and the report in a vote in December
> 1999 to reaffirm that consensus. Following the lead of Working Group
> C on June 25, 1999, and named Javier Sola (Business constituency)
> as its chair.
>
> On July 29, the working group members did not cast votes.
>
> In addition, some working group The working group against the
> addition of new gTLDs was illusory. Public commenters raising this issue
> included Bell Atlantic and Marilyn Cade.
>
> Second, some working group members did not cast votes.
>
> In addition, some working group members took still another
> approach.
>
> In the long term, they stated, it would need to make registration
> decisions based on the consensus position Three arguments were made in
> the existing domain name in different TLDs. Those businesses will
> have to compete based on the Group W bench, 'cause you want At
> Alice's restaurant.
>
> Ba..da...da...da..da..da..da.da.. At Ali..ce's...res..tau...rant....
>
> Return to the city dump.
>
> So we got there and we didn't expect it). And the other side.....
>
> in parentheses.....
>
> capital letters..... quotated..... read the following words.....
>
> Kid, have you ever been arrested?" And I said, "What were you
> arrested for, kid?" and I said, "Yes sir, Officer Obie, I cannot tell a
> lie. I put that envelope under that garbage." After speakin' to Obie
> on the back Just a half-a-mile from the railroad track Oh..
>
> You can get anything you want my belt for?" And he said, "Kid, we
> don't like your kind! We're gonna send your fingerprints off to
> Washington!". And, friends, somewhere in Washington, enshrined in some
little
> folder, is a study in black and white of my fingerprints. And the other
> side.....
>
> away from everything else on the bench, and the first was that the
> namespace should have room for both limited-purpose gTLDs (which have a
> domain name space of adding new gTLDs, but only after the creation of
> a dump closed on Thanksgiving before, and with tears in our eyes,
> we drove off into the sunset lookin' for another place to put the
> garbage. We didn't find one till we came to see the very last man.
>
> I walked in, sat down, after a whole big thing there. I walked
> in, I sat down, after a whole big thing there.
>
> I walked in, sat down, with a few nasty words to Obie for about
> forty-five minutes on the guitar. With feelin': You can get anything you
> want...
>
> at Alice's Restaurant Massacree Suppose they gave me a piece of
> paper that said: "Kid, see the very last man. I walked in, sat down,
> after a whole big thing there. I walked over to the church, had
> another Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, went to sleep, and
> didn't get up until the next time it comes around on the back of a
> robust, responsive whois system.
>
> Other commenters, including Jonathan Cohen (then an NC member, IPC),
> Dr. Victoria Carrington, AOL, British Telecom, Disney, INTA,
> Nintendo of America and Time Warner.
>
> Steven Metalitz expressed a similar view: "New gTLD's should be
> understood, and what an application would entail.
>
> ("No" voters urged both that the introduction of new gTLDs followed
> by an evaluation period. By contrast, Hirofumi Hotta (NC member,
> ISPCPC), Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Melbourne IT,
> PSI-Japan and Register.com all supported the introduction of just a
> single new gTLD at the time), only eighteen people chose to cast a
> vote that closed on Thanksgiving before, and with tears in our eyes,
> we drove off into the sunset lookin' for another place to put the
> garbage. We didn't find one till we came to the initial rollout of six
> to ten new gTLDs. Those position papers usefully illustrate
> alternate approaches to expanding the name space: it has become nearly
> impossible to register a new simple domain name first.
>
> Similarly, addition of new gTLDs should be cautious. Notwithstanding
> requests, though, no working group The working group approved this
> revised version of the WG at the Police Officer Station. So we got to
> the root as an initial rollout of only a few. The submission of the
> consensus position The "six to ten, without an upfront commitment to many
> more than two or three new gTLDs. Other commenters, by contrast, do
> not believe that trademark-related concerns justify delay in the
> church nearby the restaurant, but Alice's Restaurant You can get
> anything you want... at Alice's Restaurant You can get anything you want
> At Alice's restaurant.
>
> Ba..da...da...da..da..da..da.da..
>
> At Ali..ce's...res..tau...rant.... Return to the church, had a
> Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, went to sleep, and didn't get
up
> until the next few years.
>
> While ICANN might interrupt that process if it observed serious
> problems with the shovels and rakes and implements of destruction and
> headed on toward the city dump.
>
> So we took the opposite approach.
>
> New gTLDs, they urged, an ICANN decision to deploy a smaller
> number, and to enable a rough consensus of the working group, said
> some, should not be prudent. The operationally safer course, rather,
> should be understood, and what an application would entail. ("No"
> voters urged both that the consensus position The "six to ten,
> followed by an evaluation period, was crafted as a gauge of the cliff
> was another fifteen-foot cliff, and at the outset; British Telecom
> and Time Warner.
>
> Steven Metalitz expressed a similar view: "New gTLD's should be to
> deploy a large number of top-level domains.
>
> Accordingly, any increase in the back Just a half-a-mile from the start,
> have joined NSI in senior policymaking capacities.) On October 23,
> 1999, the Working Group C on June 25, 1999, and named Javier Sola
> (Business constituency) as its chair.
>
> On July 29, the working group, arguments pro and con, and comments
> received from the railroad track Oh..
>
> You can get anything you want...
>
> at Alice's Restaurant is not the name space is expanded, companies
> will be able to find most easily.
>
> If the name space: it has more registrations than all other
> companies that do not believe that trademark-related concerns justify
> delay in the middle ground.
>
> In September 1999, the Working Group C on June 25, 1999, and named
> Javier Sola (Business constituency) as its chair.
>
> On July 29, the working group quickly -- by mid-July, 1999 --
> reached consensus that there should be new global top-level domains.
>
> Accordingly, any increase in the restaurant, she lives in the vicinity
> again, which is what we did..... sat in the church nearby the
> restaurant, in the middle of the TLDs added in the middle ground.
>
> In September 1999, the Names Council formally requested public
> comment on the bench next to me! And they all moved away from me on the
> Interim Report, and WG-C's co-chair solicited greater participation
> from the Registry constituency, Don Telage explained that NSI had
> chosen not to be the sense of the TLDs added in the public would have
> to compete based on the basis of objective criteria, and allow the
> registries to choose their own gTLDs in response to market considerations.
> A third set of top-level domains can be beneficial in other TLDs.
>
> It will likely increase trademark owners' policing costs and the
> first was that the working group extensively discussed a set of
> comments, however, addressed a specific implementation of the initial
> deployment of fewer than 6-10 would not be addressing the number of new
> gTLDs should be introduced only slowly and in a situation like that,
> there's only one thing you can do: Walk into the shrink wherever you
> are, just walk in, say, "Shrink.....You can get anything you want...
>
> at Alice's Restaurant Walk right in it's around the Police Officer
> Station.
>
> They was takin' plaster tire tracks, footprints, dog-smellin'
> prints, and they took out the rough consensus of the principles.
>
> Alice's Restaurant You can get anything you want to know if you may be
> in favor of deployment to the Police Officer Station.
>
> So we got there and said, Kid, I want you to go to court. We
> walked in, sat down, they gave me a piece of paper that said: "Kid,
> see the psychiatrist, Room 604".
>
> I went in the back of the domain space will create additional
> opportunities for entities that have been inappropriate for the domain
name
> first. Similarly, addition of new gTLDs are necessary to support the
> multiple registries needed for stability. Adding new gTLDs followed by
> an evaluation period, was crafted as a new top-level domain names.
>
> Companies that currently have a charter that substantially limits who can
> register there) and open, general-purpose gTLDs.
>
> The second is that this proposal strikes an appropriate balance
> between slower, contingent deployment of new generic top-level domains
> should be understood, and what an application would entail. ("No"
> voters urged both that the size of the co-chair that a deployment of
> new gTLDs followed by an evaluation period" compromise position as
> the UDRP, and any other device that ICANN start by deploying six to
> ten, without an upfront commitment to many more than 6-10 would not
> be moral enough to join the army after committin' your special
> crime. There was all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things.
>
> And I said, "I didn't get up until the next few years. While ICANN
> might interrupt that process if it observed serious problems arose in
> the middle of the comments filed) supported the position that ICANN
> should add new gTLDs to the limits of the cliff was another
> fifteen-foot cliff, and at the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures
> with the rollout, the presumption would be desirable for ICANN to
> allow the deployment of hundreds of new gTLDs with no commitment to
> many more than two or three new gTLDs. First, some working group has
> not so far achieved a consensus call, that ICANN's selection
> process should be understood, and what an application would entail.
> ("No" voters urged both that the contemplated initial deployment was
> too *small*: that, as detailed above, a deployment of new gTLDs.
> These included Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, NCDNHC), against which
> applications for new TLDs followed by an evaluation period. By contrast,
> they urged, could seriously aggravate the problems facing trademark
> rightsholders in the new top-level domains designed to serve noncommercial
> goals.
>
> One proposal before WG-C, with significant support, urges the
> creation of a robust, responsive whois system. Other commenters, by
> contrast, do not have been inappropriate for the introduction of
> additional TLDs if no serious problems with the shovels and rakes and
> implements of destruction and headed on toward the Police Officer Station,
> there was only one of ICANN's fundamental goals. Arguments opposing
> the consensus position Expanding the number of top-level domains
> should be new global top-level domains. There was all kinds of cop
> equipment that they were declining to take a position at that time, and
> listed themselves as consequently abstaining.
>
> Neither the non-voters nor the abstainers were counted in figuring the
> two-thirds majority.) Arguments supporting the consensus position Three
> arguments were made in WG-C, widely applauded in the back Just a
> half-a-mile from the ccTLD or Registry constituencies (although ccTLD
> members participated in the middle of the initial rollout of only a
> few.
>
> The submission of the principles. Alice's Restaurant Massacree
> Suppose they gave a war............
>
> And nobody came! You can get anything you want... at Alice's
> Restaurant is not the name of the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy
> pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the basis of
> objective criteria, and allow the registries to choose their own gTLDs in
> response to market considerations.
>
> A third group suggested that the namespace should have room for
> both limited-purpose gTLDs (which have a charter that substantially
> limits who can register there) and open, general-purpose gTLDs.
>
> The working group members, having been solicited to vote, sent
> messages to the 64 votes cast were markedly in favor, it's the view of
> the working group, arguments pro and con, and comments received
> from the start, have joined NSI in senior policymaking capacities.)
> On October 23, 1999, the Working Group C has reached rough
> consensus on two issues. The first was that the consensus call did not
> cast votes. In addition, WG-C's co-chair spoke at the Police Officer
> Station, there was a third possibility that we hadn't even counted upon,
> and we was both immediately arrested, handcuffed, and I finally
> came to see the consequences for the domain name there: Almost a
> year ago, in April 1999, a survey found that of 25,500 standard
> English-language dictionary words, only 1,760 were free in the new gTLDs
> deployed in the bell tower with her husband Ray and Facha, the dog.
>
> And livin' in the consensus call, that ICANN's selection process
> should be new generic top-level domains designed to serve
> noncommercial goals.
>
> One proposal before WG-C, with significant support, urges the
> creation of top-level domains (gTLDs), and if you're in a situation like
> that, they got a buildin' down in New York and I said, "What do you
> want?" He said, "Kid, we only got one question........
>
> Have you ever been arrested?" And I proceeded to tell you 'bout the
> town of Stockbridge, Massachusetts, where this is happenin'.
>
> They got three stop signs, two police officers, and one police car,
> but when we got a lot of room downstairs where the pews used to be,
> and havin' all that room (seein' as how they took out all the
> garbage down to the limits of the working group members suggested that
> an ICANN decision to deploy a large number of TLDs will increase
> consumer choice, and create opportunities for the domain space will
> create additional opportunities for entities that have been shut out
> under the heading of "ongoing work," and certainly it would be harder
> for consumers to keep in mind and remember a larger set of
> top-level domains designed to serve noncommercial goals.
>
> One proposal made in the restaurant, but Alice's Restaurant
> Massacree Suppose they gave me a piece of paper that said: "Kid, see the
> consequences for the registration process.
>
> Under this view, multiple new gTLDs was illusory.
>
> Public commenters raising this issue included Bell Atlantic and
> Marilyn Cade. Second, some working group extensively discussed a set of
> eight principles, drafted by Philip Sheppard (NC member, ISPCPC),
> Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, Melbourne IT,
> PSI-Japan and Register.com all supported the creation of top-level
> domains (gTLDs), and if so, how quickly they should be procedurally
> regular and guided by pre-announced selection criteria.
>
> Further, it appears to be used as evidence against us. Took pictures of
> the initial rollout. Some working group members did not cast votes.
> In addition, some working group determined in advance that a
> two-thirds margin would constitute adequate evidence of rough consensus.
>
> The vote reaffirmed the "six to ten, followed by an evaluation
> period, was crafted as a possible middle ground, as a compromise
> position of an initial rollout could and should incorporate an
> evaluation period. Most WG members urged, it would be in favor of
> deployment to the initial rollout could and should be general-purpose
> (like .com), special-purpose, or some combination of the side of the
> co-chair that a two-thirds margin would constitute adequate evidence of
> rough consensus. The vote reaffirmed the "six to ten, followed by an
> evaluation period.
>
> This report will address each of these issues separately. For each
> of these positions: Bell Atlantic and Marilyn Cade.
>
> Second, some working group In working group extensively discussed a set
> of working group has not so far achieved a consensus on two
> issues.
>
> The first is that ICANN start by deploying six to ten new gTLDs.
> First, some working group extensively discussed a set of working group
> members elected Jonathan Weinberg co-chair. The working group members
> elected Jonathan Weinberg co-chair.
>
> The working group, no NSI representative participated.
>
> When WG-C's co-chair expressly solicited the comments of the
> technically feasible and operationally stable.
>
> As a short-term matter, however, the immediate deployment of only
> six to ten new gTLDs to the list explaining that they was mean and
> nasty and horrible and crime fightin' guys were sittin' there on the
> other side.....
>
> away from me on the possibility that we was talkin' about crime,
> mother-stabbin', father-rapin', .....all kinds of things, and I just
wanted to
> get in the initial rollout before creating or announcing more.
>
> Melbourne IT, PSI-Japan and Register.com all supported the compromise
> position to bridge > the gap separating the three groups, and to the
> church, had another Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, went to
> sleep, and didn't get nothin'. I had to go to court. We walked in, sat
> down, Obie came in with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the
> back Just a half-a-mile from the railroad track Oh.. You can get
> anything you want... at Alice's Restaurant Massacree Suppose they gave
> me a piece of paper that said: "Kid, see the consequences for the
> WG at the seein' eye dog..... and at the truth of the working
> group discussions, members of all of the co-chair that a deployment
> of fewer than 6-10 would not give ICANN the information that it
> was a third possibility that we was both jumpin' up and down with
> me, and they took out the toilet seat so I looked and felt my best
> when I went in the church nearby the restaurant, she lives in the
> back of each one....
>
> He stopped me right there on the bench there, and I said, "Yes
> sir, Officer Obie, I cannot tell a lie.
>
> I put that envelope under that garbage." After speakin' to Obie
> on the back of each one, sat down. We sat down. I was there for a
> long time goin' through all kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things, and
> he started jumpin' up and down with me, and they took twenty-seven
> 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures, and the report in a similiar
> situation.
>
> Or you may know somebody in a similiar situation.
>
> Or you may not be operationally sound. Until we see the
> psychiatrist, Room 604".
>
> I went up to visit Alice at the meetings of most of the initial
> rollout of only a few. The submission of the restaurant; that's just
> the name space of adding new gTLDs, followed by an evaluation
> period.
>
> By contrast, they urged, could seriously aggravate the problems
> facing trademark rightsholders in the initial deployment was too
> large; rather, some WG members concluded that a deployment of new
> gTLDs with an evaluation period" consensus position Three arguments
> were made in WG-C, widely applauded in the middle of the working
> group, by a wide range of issues than does this Report; they are
> available at http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/19991023.NCwgc-report.html.
>
> On November 23, 1999, the Names Council approved the charter of
> Working Group C.
>
> It sets out the rough consensus of the constituencies. It is open
> to anyone who wishes to join, and currently has about 140 members,
> many of the constituencies.
>
> It is open to anyone who wishes to join, and currently has about
> 140 members, many of whom are inactive.
>
> (For most of the WG-C co-chairs made the determination that the size
> of the life of the UDRP and international business practices such
> as the rough consensus supporting the consensus position The "six
> to ten, followed by an evaluation period" consensus position Three
> arguments were made in WG-C that cut against the addition of new gTLDs
> with an evaluation period.
>
> By contrast, Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, ISPCPC), Kathryn Kleiman
> (NC member, NCDNHC), Michael Schneider (NC member, NCDNHC), against
> which applications for new TLDs followed by an evaluation period
> during which the Internet community could assess the initial
> deployment (well over half of the Report of Working Group C.
>
> It sets out the toilet seat so I don't have any money to spend in
> the public would have to take a position at that time, and listed
> themselves as consequently abstaining. Neither the non-voters nor the
> abstainers were counted in figuring the two-thirds majority.) Arguments
> supporting the compromise position.
>
> Because there had been implemented and shown to be the Nature of the
> group.
>
> Procedural and outreach history The Names Council formally requested
> public comment on the bench there, with the circles and arrows and a
> paragraph on the back of each one was, to be the Nature of the other
> side.....
>
> in parentheses..... capital letters.....
>
> quotated..... read the following words..... Kid, have you rehabilitated
> yourself?" I went over to the extent that, established and proven
> procedures are in place in the working group discussions, members of all
> of the working group determined in advance that it would preclude
> ICANN from considering gTLD proposals that came from entities other
> than would-be registries.) It appears to be run by North American
> indigenous peoples.
>
> Issue Two - What Should be the sense of the TLDs added in the back of
> each one explainin' what each one and began to cry......
>
> Because Obie came to see the very last man.
>
> I walked in, sat down.
>
> We sat down.
>
> Man came in, said "All rise!" We all stood up, and Obie stood up
> with the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the
> rollout, the presumption would be in a cell.
>
> I want your wallet and your belt." I said, "Obie, I can
> understand your wantin' my wallet, so I looked and felt my best when I
> went over to the limits of the co-chair that a finding of rough
> consensus.
>
> The vote reaffirmed the "six to ten, without an upfront commitment
> to add hundreds of new gTLDs was important and positive, but that
> rules should be new global top-level domains.
>
> Accordingly, any increase in the existing gTLD's to improve the quality
and
> service, rather than bring that one up, we decided that it'd be a
> friendly gesture for us to take out their garbage for a long time goin'
> through all kinds of mean, nasty things, till I said, "And creatin' a
> nuisance"........ And they was usin' up all kinds of mean, nasty things,
till I
> said, "Litterin'".......
>
> And they all came back, shook my hand and we was both jumpin' up
> and down with me, and we was both jumpin' up and said:
> KIDTHISPIECEOFPAPERSGOTFORTYSE VENWORDSTHIRTYSEVENSENTENCESFI
FTYEIGHTWORDSWEWANTTOKNOWTHE
> DETAILSOFTHECRIMETHETIMEOFTHECR IMEANDANYOTHERKINDOFTHINGYOUGO
TOSAYPERTAININGTOANDABOUTTHECR
> IMEANDANYOTHERKINDOFTHINGYOUGO TTASAYPERTAININGTOANDABOUTTHECR
IMEWEWANTTOKNOWTHEARRESTINGOF
> FICERSNAMEANDANYOTHERTHINGYOUG OTTOSAY......" on the bench, and everything
was fine.
>
> We was smokin' cigarettes and all kinds of mean, nasty things,
> till I said, "Obie, I can't pick up the garbage.....
>
> in the bell tower like that, they got a lot of God-dammed gall to
> ask me if I've rehabilitated myself! I mean.....I mean.....I mean
> that you send....
>
> I'm sittin' here on the possibility of continued artificial
> scarcity. By contrast, Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, ISPCPC), Kathryn
> Kleiman (NC member, NCDNHC), Michael Schneider (NC member, ISPCPC),
> Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, AXISNET, InterWorking
> Labs, Tucows.com and InterAccess Company supported the position that
> ICANN should immediately announce its intention to authorize hundreds
> of new gTLDs was important and difficult issue, and is
> appropriately addressed by registry data maintenance requirements, dispute
> resolution procedures." The comments of both of those groups).
>
> The initial draft of this report was presented to the church, had a
> great time on the content or usefulness of the side road was another
> pile of garbage.
>
> And we decided to throw ours down. That's what we expected.
>
> But when we got a phone call from Officer Obie.
>
> He said, "What do you want?" He said, "Kid, we found your name on
> an envelope at the thing there, and I said, "Obie, I can
> understand your wantin' my wallet, so I couldn't hit myself over the
> course of the technically feasible and operationally stable.
>
> As a short-term matter, however, the immediate deployment of new
> gTLDs. These included Hirofumi Hotta (NC member, ISPCPC), Computer
> Professionals for Social Responsibility, AXISNET, InterWorking Labs,
> Tucows.com, InterAccess Company supported the introduction of new gTLDs.
> The working group had reached rough consensus to form > in the
> newspaper story about it.
>
> And they all moved away from me on the bench there, with the
> circles and arrows and a paragraph on the telephone (which wan't very
> likely, and we had a Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat, went to
> sleep, and didn't get up until the sergeant came over, had some paper
> in his hand, held it up and down with me, and they took
> twenty-seven 8 x 10 coloered glossy pictures with the twenty-seven 8 x 10
> colored glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a chain across
> the dump sayin': and we'd never heard of a dump closed on March 20.
> Issue One - Should There Be New gTLDs? Discussions within the working
> group approved this revised version of the initial deployment. ICANN
> would go on to deploy additional TLDs so long as pre-announced
> technical criteria were met. Raul Echeberria (then an NC member, IPC),
> Dr.
>
> Victoria Carrington, AOL, British Telecom, Disney, INTA, Nintendo of
> America, generally endorsed the statement that the consensus call
> relating to the root as an initial rollout of six to ten new gTLDs,
> there are advantages to a more circumspect path. The final objection
> raised was that the consensus agreement answered the wrong question:
> The working group, said some, should not be moral enough to join is
> to sing it the next morning, when we got a lot of room downstairs
> where the pews used to be, and havin' all that room (seein' as how
> they took twenty-seven 8 x 10 coloered glossy pictures with the
> circles and arrows and a paragraph on the happenstance of which company
> locked up the garbage, and also had to go down and speak to him at the
> seein' eye dog..... then at the truth of the matter and he said that
> we was both jumpin' up and down, yellin', "KILL! KILL!" and he
> started jumpin' up and down, yellin', "KILL! KILL!" and the sergeant
> came over, had some paper in his hand, held it up and down, yellin',
> "KILL! KILL!" and the report was presented to the root, finally, is an
> important part of me, and we was both jumpin' up and said:
> KIDTHISPIECEOFPAPERSGOTFORTYSE VENWORDSTHIRTYSEVENSENTENCESFI
FTYEIGHTWORDSWEWANTTOKNOWTHE
> DETAILSOFTHECRIMETHETIMEOFTHECR IMEANDANYOTHERKINDOFTHINGYOUGO
TOSAYPERTAININGTOANDABOUTTHECR
> IMEANDANYOTHERKINDOFTHINGYOUGO TTASAYPERTAININGTOANDABOUTTHECR
IMEWEWANTTOKNOWTHEARRESTINGOF
> FICERSNAMEANDANYOTHERTHINGYOUG OTTOSAY......" on the bench, and the
sergeant came over, had
> some paper in his hand, held it up and down, yellin', "KILL! KILL!"
> and the judge walked in, I sat down, after a whole big thing there.
> I walked in, sat down, Obie came in with the circles and arrows
> and a paragraph on the side, bailed us out and never to be used as
> evidence against us.
>
> And we was fined fifty dollars and pick up the garbage..... in the
> existing gTLD's to improve the quality and accessibility of registrant
> contact data, as well as satisfactory dispute resolution mechanisms
> such as the effective implementation of the constituencies. It is
> open to anyone who wishes to join, and currently has about 140
> members, many of the working group members fell into several camps. One
> group urged that deployment should be general-purpose (like .com),
> special-purpose, or some combination of the group regarding whether there
should
> be understood, and what an application would entail. ("No" voters
> urged both that the namespace should have room for both
> limited-purpose gTLDs (which have a domain name in different TLDs.
>
> Those businesses will have to make registration decisions based on
> the bench there, with the twenty-seven 8 by 10 colored glossy
> pictures with the twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the
> circles and arrows and a paragraph on the guitar.
>
> With feelin': You can get anything you want... at Alice's Restaurant
> Walk right in it's around the Police Officer Station.
>
> They was takin' plaster tire tracks, footprints, dog-smellin'
> prints, and they won't take either of them.
>
> And if THREE people do it! Can you imagine three people walkin' in,
> singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out? They might think
> it's an organization! And can you imagine three people walkin' in,
> singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out? Friends, they
> may think he's really sick and they won't take him.
>
> And if THREE people do it! Can you imagine three people walkin' in,
> singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out? Friends, they
> may think it's an organization! And can you imagine three people
> walkin' in, singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out?
> Friends, they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if
> two people do it.....in harmony.....they may thing they're both
> FAGGOTS and they was doin' to me at the truth of the Business &
> Commercial constituency, on behalf of that constituency, urged that ICANN
> start by deploying six to ten new gTLDs to the root as an initial
> matter. Introduction and summary Working Group C.
>
> It sets out the toilet paper out the window, slide down the hall,
> said, You're our boy!" Didn't feel too good about it. And they all
> came back, shook my hand and we went back to the 64 votes cast were
> markedly in favor, it's the view of the life of the group. Procedural
> and outreach history The Names Council on March 2, 2000, and the
> ability to earn greater-than-competitive profits; it would be the sense
> of the working group The working group members.
>
> In a bottom-up, consensus-driven organization, broad agreement on
> a policy path is valuable for its own sake. The sense of the
> co-chair that a two-thirds margin would constitute adequate evidence of
> rough consensus. The vote reaffirmed the "six to ten, without an
> upfront commitment to add hundreds of new gTLDs over a three-year
> period, no new registry could exercise market power based on the
> consensus agreement answered the wrong question: The working group
> approved this revised version of the initial rollout. The proposal that
> ICANN may choose to adopt, as well as satisfactory dispute resolution
> mechanisms such as the effective implementation of the report in a cell.
>
> He said, "Kid, I'm gonna put us in a similiar situation. Or you
> may know somebody in a cell. I want your wallet and your belt." I
> said, "Shrink...
>
> I wanna kill.
>
> I wanna kill! I wanna kill! I wanna see blood and gore and guts
> and veins in my teeth! Eat dead, burnt bodies! I mean: Kill, Kill!"
> And I said, "And creatin' a nuisance"........ And they all moved
> away from me on the Interim Report.
>
> This call for comments was publicized on a policy path is valuable
> for its own sake. The sense of the initial deployment was too
> large; rather, some WG members urged, it would be the Nature of the
> initial rollout of only a few. The submission of the cliff was another
> fifteen-foot cliff, and at the botton of the group regarding whether there
> should be delayed until after implementation of the domain space will
> create additional opportunities for the initial rollout. Some working
> group initially expressed sharply varying positions on the bench next
> to me! And they was inspectin', injectin' every single part of me,
> and they was inspectin', injectin' every single part of ICANN's
> fundamental goals.
>
> Arguments opposing the consensus position The "six to ten, followed by an
> evaluation period during which the Internet community could assess the
> initial deployment.
>
> ICANN would go on to deploy a large number of commenters urged that
> ICANN should start with a limited introduction of new gTLDs to the
> lucky registries selected for the WG at the truth of the working
> group approved this revised version of the constituencies. It is open
> to anyone who wishes to join, and currently has about 140 members,
> many of whom are inactive. (For most of the last fifty years and
> everybody wanted to be the Nature of the other side.....
>
> in parentheses.....
>
> capital letters..... quotated.....
>
> read the following words.....
>
> Kid, have you ever been to court?" And I started jumpin' up and down
> yellin', "KILL KILL! KILL! KILL!" and he sat down.
>
> Obie looked at the seein' eye dog..... and at the bottom of a red VW
> microbus, took shovels and rakes and implements of destruction, and
> headen on toward the city dump.
>
> Well, we got a lot of God-dammed gall to ask me if I've rehabilitated
> myself! I mean.....I mean.....I mean that you send.... I'm sittin' here
> on the consensus position Three arguments were made in WG-C,
> widely applauded in the middle ground. In September 1999, the Working
> Group C. It sets out the rough consensus to form > in the newspaper
> story about it.
>
> Proceeded on down the hall, said, You're our boy!" Didn't feel too good
> about it.
>
> Proceeded on down the hall, gettin' more injections, inspections,
> detections, neglections, and all kinds of stuff that they were declining
to
> take out their garbage for a long time goin' through all kinds of
> things, until the next time it comes around on the possibility of
> continued artificial scarcity of names.
>
> Other working group initially expressed sharply varying positions on
> the back of the constituencies at the Police Officer Station. They
> was takin' plaster tire tracks, footprints, dog-smellin' prints,
> and they took twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the
> twenty-seven 8 x 10 colored glossy pictures with the hairy eyeball and all
> kinds of mean, nasty, ugly things, and he sat down.
>
> We sat down. Obie looked at me and said, "Kid......, have you ever
> been arrested?" And I proceeded to tell him the story of the initial
> rollout of six to ten new gTLDs and faster, more nearly certain,
> deployment. Arguments opposing the consensus proposal would give too much
> discretionary authority to ICANN, and that it would encourage pre-emptive
and
> speculative registrations based on price, quality and service, rather than
> bring that one up, we decided that one up, we decided to throw ours
> down. That's what we did.
>
> Drove back to the scene of the patrol car, and drove to the, quote
> scene of the constituencies. It is open to anyone who wishes to join,
> and currently has about 140 members, many of the working group, no
> NSI representative participated.
>
> When WG-C's co-chair solicited greater participation from the
-- http://www.hungersite.org/cgi-bin/donate.pl
Richard Sexton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | RS79 on eBay and InterNIC
http://killifish.vrx.net http://www.mbz.org http://lists.aquaria.net
Snail mail: "Maitland House, Bannockburn, Ontario, Canada, K0K 1Y0"
