Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > Richard has made it very clear to you that he will not participate in this > farce called the DNSO. The DNSO voice is in desparate need of voices to > rationalize thier farce - and Richard has no intention of lending his name > or support to the DNSO farce Well, that's his choice, I suppose. It seems to me that some of the DNSO folks that are in favor of less regulation and consideration given to original new TLD applicants could use his support. > Now - why am I denied participation in WG-C. I attempted to subscribe - > got back a notice the listadmin had to approve me - and have heard nothing > else since then. Deal with that. Sorry, Joe, but you brought this upon yourself. --gregbo
- [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol issue) Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpo... !Dr. Joe Baptista
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpo... Joe Baptista
- Re: [IFWP] DNSO participation (Was: Re: Interpol is... Greg Skinner
