Karl Auerbach a wrote:
> Bret and Diane are both very concerned
> about ICANN and internet governance.
Concerned? What does that mean?
> They have both worked hard, very
> hard, indeed extremely hard, to actually do something about it.
Like luring people into a worthless Membership Advisory Committee,
defending a rigged DNSO, and justifying an extra-legal and one-sided
UDRP. Thanks, Bret and Diane, for your wonderful hard work!
> If it were not for Diane, there would not even be the partially open
> at-large. She has worked her tail off on behalf of the Internet
> community.
If she and the others who form the loyal opposition to ICANN weren't
there to disguise its true purpose, the At-large would be evidently
a trumped up sham, instead of a disguised sham. Thanks again, Diane
and Bret, for tricking the Internet community.
> Bret keeps an eagle eye out for ICANN's violation of its rules and is
> working very hard to reach the "suits" and broadcast media.
Watches out for ICANN's "violations", and then sends pathetic
complaints and Requests For Reconsideration to the violators. People
who listen to him might believe he was actually having some effect.
Thanks for fooling them, Bret.
> We would be wise to avoid emulating Saturn and, instead, remember that
> each of us works in our own way.
Speak for yourself. Neither I nor many others are abetting ICANN by
pretending to reform it. You and your friends Fausett and Cabell are
like the people who run the Italian-American Cultural Association
for the Mafia.
============================================================
Michael Sondow I.C.I.I.U. http://www.iciiu.org
Tel. (718)846-7482 Fax: (603)754-8927
============================================================
