Doesn't seem that important. It's not like poeple can't
figure out [deleted] means S.D.Dellheim Companies
At 04:30 PM 5/17/00 -0700, Roeland Meyer (E-mail) wrote:
>Boy, it's a good thing that I pulled down my own copy <g>.
>
>Not meaning to be too argumentative Richard, but wy did you give
>in and why did you feel the need to be "too tired to argue"?
>Personally, the archives are public words. No newspaper would
>have done it either. It sort of invalidates the archives, you
>know? It's the first step towards revisionism, the next step is
>re-insertion.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Owner-Domain-Policy
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>> Behalf Of Richard J. Sexton
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 4:22 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: S.D.Dellheim Companies?
>>
>>
>> I got a few phone calls and emails from this fellow asking me
>to
>> remove all references to his name from the PAB archives that
>> I maintain a mirror of on newdom.com.
>>
>> I really didn't like the idea of doing this, to my mind
>> archived are either complete or they're not, but he
>> was veryu polite, firm and insitant and I was basically
>> too tired to argue.
>>
>> So, anywhere you see [Deleted] in the PAB arrhives on
>newdom.com
>> pretend the words S.D.Dellheim Companies was there.
>>
>> Is anybody else getting mail from S.D.Dellheim Companies about
>this?
>>
>>
>> --
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://ph-1.613.473.1719
>> It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good
>beer. - BKR
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ph-1.613.473.1719
It's about travel on expense accounts to places with good beer. - BKR
