On what basis are you running for an ICANN BoD seat?
On reading a few lines of your candidate statement, I note that you
call for many of the same things that the IFWP (and the ORSC) called
for long long ago in a meeting far far away (in Singapore;-)...
What makes you think that you can have any significant influence on
getting ICANN to reverse course and adopt any of you ideas?
Its BoD is moribund, and has turning into a deaf and dumb rubber stamp.
My view is that the proper thing to do with ICANN is let it throw
itself off a cliff, without anyone trying to stoop it from doing so.
As for this IFWP list, I dearly hope it does not turn into yet
another ICANN subcommittee without portfolio, trying to help you get
elected to save ICANN from itself.
Cheers...\Stef
PS: I have no authority here in IFWPland,
and very likely very little influence as well;-)...
At 17:45 -0400 09/09/01, Joanna Lane wrote:
>Just a note to introduce myself to this list. For those that don't me,
>please visit http://www.internetstakeholders.com, with particular reference
>to the ICANN Board Candidate Statement I made yesterday at Montevideo.
>
>Is there a subscriber list?
>
>Regards,
>Joanna
