Is this true? Does it not depend on _how_ you work inside ICANN? I see
a lot of people active on the ncdnhc list who 'hate' ICANN as much as
possible. Still they vote for the ICANN board seat (maybe without
success) if they happen to be on the Names Council. Lets not ostracize
each other. I am not putting any money on ICANN. Still, I don't see
why I could not participate in some of its processes and at the same
time be part of 'alternatives'. I would rather see things in the
perspective of the wrong party being in power. Not the power being so
entagled in cosa nostra that all I can do is buy a gun and go into the
mountains.
Anyway, I live in a country that is flat.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, at 15:57 [=GMT-0600], Ken Freed wrote:
> Working within ICANN lends legitimacy to an innately illegitimate enterprise.
> There has never been any public vote for privatization or any vote for ICANN.
> Please do not ignore that the would-be emperor still wears no clothes.
> -- ken
>
>
> >On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Einar Stefferud wrote:
> >
> >> In my view, ICANN is no longer worthy of further attention,
> >> as their deliberate intention is to disenfranchise all of us.
> >>
> >> We need to find our own solution to the new TLD problem, and the
> >> cooperative maintenance of the Virtual Inclusive Root.
> >
> >
> Partick Greenwell replied:
> >
> >Burying your head in the sand and wishing the problem away won't make it
> >so.
> >
> >Ignore ICANN to your own detriment.
>
>
>
