>The parallel universe of TLDs needs either a breathrough application (a
>mere click on the browser that allows people to select their choice of root
>server operator) or breakthrough content that makes people want to
>reconfigure computers to access that information.
(It's difficult, at this time, to think of anything but the massive amount
of lives lost in vain today and dns issues seem like such trite matter in
comparison)
OTOH, Ellen, such an application may not be required. Look at the changes
in the landscale in the past few years. Didn't you once say that you
didn't like .com and vanity names and would use your .ca.us address
forever?
I see a log of people that used to be very anti-alternative tld but
now aren't. I see a lot of previous MoU signatories that now use,
say, the ORSC root. I don't see the opposite. Numbers perhaps
are significant, but trends morso.
(back to the carnage)
--
"But at the end of the day, even if you put a calico dress on
it and call it Florence, a pig is still a pig."
-- Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp. et al., 2001 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8962, (S. D. Tex., 2001).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
