Note: There was never a public vote to privatise the Internet, which is (was) public property. There was never a public vote to give control of public property to ICANN, which remains an illigitimate pretence of being an Internet government. This latest move further proves what I've been saying for years. -- kf
>Am I mistaken, or did the DoC's White Paper call for management of the >domain name system by the private sector? > >And what was that ICANN Article of Incorporation about "lessening the >burdens of government"? > >Jay Fenello wrote: > >> At 2/25/02 12:08 PM, Chris Chiu wrote: >> >During a private "retreat," the President of the Internet Corporation for >> >Assigned Names and Numbers, M. Stuart Lynn, proposed vast changes to >>ICANN's >> >governing structure. These plans call for... national governments to >>select a third of ICANN's >> >reconstituted Board.
