You want ext4 for the TRIM support for SSDs.

And thank you for your patronage. :-)  RHEL5.6 has ext4 as a supported file 
system.  Make sure to register your RHEL system with Red Hat Network to get 
your updates.

--
Kyle Gonzales
Sent from my mobile

On Apr 2, 2011, at 3:52 AM, Patrick Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> I just plopped down $400 for a 6G 4 core 3Ghz box with respectable performance
> ratings on PassMark.  Its amazing what you get nowdays, Moore's Law is a 
> wonderful thing.
> 
> I then added a OCZ 60G drive for Linux and proceeded to install various Linux 
> distros.
> 
> I started with the latest Fedora but ran into some installation issues.
> Anaconda has always had it out for me. Since I'm not really particular about 
> distro I moved
> on to the latest Ubuntu.
> 
> I am experiencing amazing performance with SSD.  Everything is so quiet yet 
> so fast that
> it's eerie.  I'm old school and expect to hear the machine whine, hum and 
> grind when I
> hammer it.  The silence is, however, very nice.
> 
> Unfortunately Ubuntu wouldn't run some of the enterprise software I want to 
> experiment with
> so I moved on to RHEL 5.6 after plopping down another $49 for the distro.  I 
> have to wonder
> if CentOS would have been fully compatible, but suspect that the software 
> installer was
> explicitly checking for RHEL.
> 
> One thing I wonder about is with a total SSD environment is should I even 
> bother allocating
> swap given that I believe that I have enough memory to handle the task for 
> which this box is
> destined for?
> 
> Given the nature of SSD it seems that allocating a swap partition will 
> greatly reduce the MTBF
> of this drive since the write leveling for any swap spillover would be 
> confined to that partition.
> Am I correct in my thinking?
> 
> Should I favor one filesystem versus another for a drive of this type?  I'm
> currently using the drive primarily formatted as an ext3 filesystem with a
> small swap partition of 2G.   In the old days we'd set aside 1.5x or 2x swap 
> based
> on memory.  However given 60G of hard disk and 8G of ram can't see blowing 
> 12G on
> a swap partition for a presumably antiquated rule of thumb.
> 
> - Pat                                                  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive      http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2
RSS Feed     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml
Unsubscribe  [email protected]

Reply via email to