In case it wasn't obvious, I was actually kidding regarding the shell comment. It would be nice, but I can think of many reasons not to do it.
*puts on flame-retardant suit* On the other hand, speaking of virtualization, good virtualization would not be necessary with a properly set up BSD box with jailed accounts. On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:49 PM, R P Herrold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Chad Bailey wrote: > >> Sorry, I'm sure that probably doesn't give you much to go off of. > > >> ... virtual machines for various experiments > > >> Oh, I got it! Create multiple VPS's for your fellow jaxlug members and >> give them each a root shell of their own! :D hehehe > > > sadly, virtualization on this orphaned architecture [not that Intel will > admit it] is not maturing as quickly as on i386 / x86_64 > > The LSB would use it as a donation [1] and be happy for it, but the cost of > shopping (to the Oregon St Univ Open Source Lab) and feeding (paid for by > others at OSUOSL) the beast power makes it had to justify. Having a > dedicated IA64 fpr the LSB would be a goodness > > -- Russ herrold > > [1] > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/2012-February/007058.html > > 'ia64 herrold has a spare unit in his DC, with a pair of boot > drives to alternate between' > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Archive http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2 > RSS Feed http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml > Unsubscribe [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive http://marc.info/?l=jaxlug-list&r=1&w=2 RSS Feed http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml Unsubscribe [email protected]
