This is more or less what Mach-II does when you put a gateway inside your listener--it will get loaded into the application scope when the Mach-II app first loads. Should be fine (and make good sense actually) to have these objects that you use over and over in the application scope.
On 1/30/06, Dave Shuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So as not to continually add the expense of re-instantiating gateway CFCs, > is it safe to store an instance of a gateway CFC for each object in the > application scope and just call gateway methods like > application.UserGateway.listUsers()?. I was thinking about > having an application initialization routine in my Mach-II application that > will instantiate each gateway in the application scope onApplicationStart. > Is there a better way of handling this? > > Thanks for any input. > > -- > ~Dave Shuck > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.daveshuck.com > _______________________________________________ > Reply to DFWCFUG: > [email protected] > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list > List Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ > http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ > DFWCFUG Sponsors: > www.HostMySite.com > www.teksystems.com/ > > > -- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com _______________________________________________ Reply to DFWCFUG: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors: www.HostMySite.com www.teksystems.com/
