Re: [DFW CFUG] Coldfusion Query Results as Transfer Objects?

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:49:07 -0700

I think the only argument against it would be consistency.  If 85% of your TOs were structs, and the other 15% were query results, it might lead to confusion down the line.  Other than that, I don't see any issue.

~Dave

On 10/13/06, Eric Knipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wondering, what do you guys think about using the result of a <cfquery> as a transfer object, rather than creating a struct?
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
 [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
 www.HostMySite.com
  www.teksystems.com/





--
~Dave Shuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daveshuck.com 
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives: 
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors: 
  www.HostMySite.com 
  www.teksystems.com/

Reply via email to