if you're doing a multi-query transaction then you need something like this
to rollback any inserts, etc if one of the queries fails. cftransaction will
automatically insert the data up to the point there's an error. without that
error checking, it becomes a huge headache to maintain, for example,
customer order transactions. I would much rather have a db full of
successful transactions than one with incomplete transactions to sort
through. But then, I'm a little fanatical these days about this kind of
stuff. :)

On 7/26/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Not that this post was originally about using cftransaction, but isn't the
try/catch stuff unnecessary because of the nature of the cftransaction tag
itself? That's what I thought. I could be dead wrong. ;o)

Chris

On 7/26/07, Chris Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One of the better ways I've found to handle transactions using CF is
> like this:
>
> <cflock name="AddOrder" timeout="10">
>   <cfset commit = true>
>   <cftransaction action="begin">
>   <cftry>
>     <cfquery>
>        blah blah
>    </cfquery>
>    <cfquery>
>      blah blah
>    </cfquery>
>    <cfcatch type="any">
>     <cfset commit = false>
>     <cftransaction action="rollback" />
>     <cflocation addtoken="false" url="errorpage.cfm">
>    </cfcatch>
>   </cftry>
>   <cfif commit>
>     <cftransaction action="commit" />
>     <cflocation addtoken="false" url="success.cfm">
>   </cfif>
>   </cftransaction>
> </cflock>
>
> The transaction is only added to the db if every query or function is
> successful. This prevents multiple transaction sessions from interfering
> with each other and disallows partial inserts/updates/etc (like in a
> shopping cart solution) from being entered in to the db.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Chris
>
>  On 7/26/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > I'm not an authority, but here's what I think I know:
> >
> > INNODB tables are slower *because* they allow for transactions.
> > Transactional databases (tables?) allow you to roll back changes that were
> > made to it. So it keeps track of all changes that have been made and store
> > them so that you can roll back a particular insert or update or what have
> > you as if that statement had not taken place. I have no idea how far back it
> > keeps information of this sort, I just know that on other DBs I've worked
> > with (older versions of DB2) this means that extra disk space is required to
> > store all the changes.
> >
> > The only senario that *I'm* aware of (I'm sure there are loads more)
> > would be when doing something like this:
> >
> > <cftransaction>
> >     <cfquery name="update" datasource="blahblah">
> >         UPDATE InventoryTable
> >         SET ItemQuantity = ItemQuantity - 1 -- I think you can do this
> > in sql... if not just consider it psuedo code ;o)
> >         WHERE ItemID = #MyItemID#
> >     </cfquery>
> >     <!--- customers automattically get entered for a prize drawing or
> > something --->
> >     <cfquery name="insert" datasource="blahblah">
> >         INSERT INTO PrizeDrawingTable (CustomerID, ItemID)
> >         VALUES (#MyCustomerID#, #MyItemID#)
> >     </cfquery>
> > </cftransaction>
> >
> > In this case if the first query fails for some reason, then the second
> > query wouldn't execute. If the first query was successful but the second
> > query failed, then the first query would be 'Undone' or rolled back.
> >
> > This may be an overly simplistic view, and since I don't do this sort
> > of thing often, I may have even gotten something wrong. Someone please
> > correct me if I did get something wrong.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >  On 7/26/07, Kevin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >   Anyone have experience with MySQL?  I have been using it for years
> > > now but I wonder if I might have outgrown it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The way that I understand it is that my MyISAM tables are faster but
> > > INNODB allow for transaction support (which I have never fully 
understood).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We have been using MyISAM for years and have been satisfied.
> > > However, I am told that in order to make a backup of the database you have
> > > to shut it down, back it up, then restart it.  This is absurd.  Therefore,
> > > we were considering moving to INNODB but everything I read says that these
> > > are *VERY* slow tables.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any advise….should we move away from
> > > MySQL?   Is there a solution to back up MyISAM?  Is the performance of
> > > INNODB really not as bad as I have read.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am so confused and frustrated……I understand that MySQL is used by
> > > some pretty big hitters (http://www.mysql.com/customers/ ).  What
> > > are these guys using?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help, advise, comments, etc. will be tremendously appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin Fricke
> > >
> > > Lone Star Media
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Office: (512) 371-1822
> > >
> > > Mobile: (512) 626-0528
> > >
> > > Fax: (512) 597-0909
> > >
> > > Toll Free: (877) 791-7083
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.lonestarmedia.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Reply to DFWCFUG:
> > >   [email protected]
> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > >  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
> > > List Archives:
> > >     http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
> > >   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
> > > DFWCFUG Sponsors:
> > >   www.instantspot.com/
> > >   www.teksystems.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://cjordan.us
> > _______________________________________________
> > Reply to DFWCFUG:
> >  [email protected]
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
> > List Archives:
> >    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
> >   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
> > DFWCFUG Sponsors:
> >  www.instantspot.com/
> >   www.teksystems.com/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "Fortune favors the prepared mind."
> - Louis Pasteur
> _______________________________________________
> Reply to DFWCFUG:
>  [email protected]
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
> List Archives:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
> DFWCFUG Sponsors:
>  www.instantspot.com/
>   www.teksystems.com/
>
>


--
http://cjordan.us

_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
 [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
 http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
 www.instantspot.com/
 www.teksystems.com/




--
"Fortune favors the prepared mind."
- Louis Pasteur
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives: 
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors: 
  www.instantspot.com/
  www.teksystems.com/

Reply via email to