On Mon, September 19, 2011 17:05, David Burgess wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Steven Sherwood <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello list, > >> > >> > >> > >> I’m considering a few different platforms for low powered but > Gigabit > >> capable firewall/routers, and have been looking at Mini-ITX systems > >> based on > >> Atom processors. > > > > I have a D510-based dual Intel NIC board that consumes around 19W > idle > > with a PicoPSU and will route around 350 Mbps using the default > packet > > size in iperf, or 600+ Mbps with net.inet.ip.fastforwarding enabled. > > > > I have also done a system based on an Intel DH57JG board + i3 560, > > 2.5" hdd and PicoPSU that used 17-19W idle and would route wire speed > > (950 Mbps steady, using a vlan switch) on iperf with ~60% idle CPU in > > top. > > > > Lastly, I have an Intel DQ67EP board with i5 2500, SSD, and DC-DC PSU > > (Antec) that uses ~19W idle. I haven't run pfsense on this one or > > tested its routing capacity. > > > > I hope the extra data points will be useful to you. > > > > db > > It really great to see these numbers, and all others that were said in > here. But now, even more I'm curious about AMD brazos numbers. > > I have an old Atom here, that I know is a great pfSense performer. But > what would look like if I had an AMD small cpu (those brazos). I > imagine > this is also the wonder that the OP had. :) > > matheus >
Yes - I have definitely been wondering that as well. :) _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
