On 12/21/2011 12:18 PM, greg whynott wrote: > > That's probably not going to work - I don't think anyone ever > intended for two version of squid to be on one system. > > > why wouldn't it, there is nothing preventing you from having two > processes running, bound to different interfaces. this is unix, not > windows.
The package author(s) would have to coordinate something like that to make sure they didn't kill each other's dependencies and also to control them independently. It is not likely that happened. Especially since the Squid3 package still isn't considered 'stable'. > Besides, why not just port forward exchange through the firewall - > there is no need for squid to do this. > > > because its not what we want to do. you may not have a need but others > do, which is probably a good indication why the solution was developed. What specifically about squid-reverse makes it useful in your scenario? Perhaps if you describe your situation in more detail we could recommend an alternate solution. Jim _______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
